Laserfiche WebLink
P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission <br />3 of 7 <br />Objective Standards for Housing Element Sites <br />Exhibit A to this agenda report is the draft objective design standards for Housing Element <br />sites. The initial feedback from the Commission’s September 2021 review has been <br />incorporated into an updated draft, along with additional standards applicable to other project <br />types. Therefore, the document identifies standards for various types of housing: multifamily <br />and single-family. Key changes to the document since the Commission’s September 2021 <br />review include revision of introductory text regarding the project review process; standards for <br />bedroom mix and affordability levels; reference to the municipal code for minimum site <br />development standards; and inclusion of objective standards applicable to single-family <br />development, all of which are discussed in detail below. <br />Project Review and Approval Procedures <br />The Housing Accountability Act and recent changes to other sections of State law impact how <br />the City is able to review housing projects. Additionally, the Planned Unit Development (PUD) <br />process has been questioned during review by the Housing and Community Development <br />Department (HCD) of the Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element. To this end, the draft Housing <br />Element includes a program for the City to reevaluate (and update the municipal code <br />accordingly) to its PUD process such that sites identified for housing in the Housing Element <br />are reviewed strictly for conformance to applicable objective design standards . This process <br />would still entail review by the Planning Commission (and City Council if appealed), but the <br />review would be limited to objective standards. Therefore, the draft standards as proposed <br />includes text that outlines this process and expectation. <br />Objective Design Standards and Affordability Mix <br />Implementation programs in the Draft 6th Cycle Housing Element indicate that the City will, <br />among other things, develop ODS (as presented in this report) and that it will update its <br />Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance (IZO). The IZO currently does not specify the desired affordable <br />housing mix in terms of income levels, and past practice has been to negotiate this with <br />developers through the Affordable Housing Agreement. The objective of the amendments to <br />the IZO would be to specify a target mix of unit sizes (by number of bedrooms) and <br />affordability levels. <br />In the interest of establishing the bedroom mix and affordability requirements with the Housing <br />Element adoption, the draft ODS for the Housing Sites3 includes a bedroom mix and <br />affordability requirements. <br />Bedroom Mix: <br />Minimum of 10-percent of units to be Three-Bedroom; <br />45-percent of units to be Two-Bedroom; and <br />The remainder One-Bedroom or Studio, except that no more than 10-percent of units <br />may be Studios <br />3 The ODS for R-M, C-C, and M-U Districts do not include this same requirement. Projects in these districts would <br />need to meet the requirements of the IZO, but the unit size and affordability levels would be on a project-by- <br />project basis. This is due to the fact that many of the projects anticipated in these zoning districts would not be <br />subject to the IZO (i.e., the IZO applies to new multifamily residential projects of 15 units or more, where at least <br />15 percent of the project’s dwelling units shall be affordable to very low, and/or low income households). If the <br />IZO were to apply, the bedroom-mix and affordability levels would need to be custom-tailored to account for the <br />lack of “economies of scale.”