Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />City of Pleasanton <br />December 14, 2022 <br />Page 5 <br />standards for some HEU sites, stakeholders and the community have not had <br />sufficient time to analyze them and provide input. If the ODS and IZO amendments <br />are unworkable, all, or nearly all housing development projects on HEU sites will <br />need to undergo the City’s time-consuming traditional and discretionary PUD <br />rezoning process that HCD correctly requested the City to specifically analyze. <br />Finally, it appears that several of the ODS necessarily require staff to exercise <br />subjective judgment to determine whether a project is consistent with them.9 As a <br />result, these standards do not meet the narrow definition of “objective” standards <br />provided in controlling state housing law. As noted in the staff report, state housing <br />law discourages such subjective standards and prohibits the City from relying on <br />them to deny a qualifying housing development project or require that it be <br />developed at a lower density. <br />With the above in mind, the City should focus its time and resources only on <br />adopting the HEU with corresponding General Plan land use element amendments <br />by January 2023. The City could then proceed with a comprehensive adoption <br />process for the ODS and IZO amendments over the following months with sufficient <br />opportunity for community review and input.10 <br />9 A non-exhaustive list of some of these inherently subjective standards include: ODS A9.a, <br />landscape plans “should incorporate seasonal variety and color to the maximum extent <br />feasible”; ODS B2.a, entries “should be the predominant feature of front facades” and larger <br />buildings “should have a prominent, centralized primary building entrance”; ODS B3.a, <br />“[w]indows are a very important element of building form and should be well organized on a <br />building façade to create a pattern of multiple hierarchies”; ODS B4.b, providing that <br />“[s]uccessful roof design should emphasize the vertical proportions of individual units rather <br />than horizontal building massing”; ODS B5.c, “[c]hanges in material and/or color should be <br />used to articulate building elements such as building entries; base, body, and parapet caps; <br />or bays and arcades..”; ODS B5.d, providing that “[a]rchitectural details and <br />elements…should be scaled appropriately based on viewing distance from ground-level.” <br />There are several other inherently subjective ODS not listed here. <br />10 In doing so, the City’s HEU would be focused on providing the program-level detail state <br />law requires, while also allowing for a sufficiently comprehensive adoption process for ODS <br />and IZO amendments. State law requires Housing Elements to include an “identification and <br />analysis of existing and projected housing needs” with a corresponding “statement of goals, <br />policies, quantified objectives, financial resources, and scheduled programs for the <br />preservation, improvement, and development of housing…” It does not require <br />contemporaneous adoption of detailed design and affordability standards. (Gov. Code, § <br />65583.) <br />Exhibit D - ODS Public Comments - 01-11-23 PC - Page 5