My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
122022
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2022 12:16:21 PM
Creation date
12/16/2022 12:16:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/20/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
22 ATTACHMENT 1-2
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\122022
22 ATTACHMENT 3-5
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2022\122022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
sites that allow multifamily development outside of downtown (i.e., sites with the R-M or <br /> C-C District zoning), the draft objective standards would apply to these sites as well. <br /> Attachment 4 to this agenda report is a map that shows the areas of Pleasanton that <br /> have the zoning classifications mentioned herein. <br /> Relationship of R-M, C-C, M-U District Objective Standards to Other Documents <br /> The purpose of the objective standards is to supplement — not replace — other policy <br /> documents such as the Downtown Specific Plan and Downtown Design Guidelines, as <br /> these other documents have sections the remain applicable to other types of projects <br /> and have guidelines that could still apply to residential development. Notably, however, <br /> only the objective standards could be enforced for review of development standards. <br /> Attachment 5 to this report provides a "crosswalk" of how the objective standards relate <br /> to (non-objective) guidelines or policies reflected in Downtown Specific Plan, and <br /> Downtown Design Guidelines. The standards also repeat and make use of some <br /> components included in the separate Draft Objective Standards for Housing Sites, and <br /> the crosswalk identifies those instances. <br /> As is shown in Attachment 5, the R-M, C-C, and M-U District objective standards are a <br /> compilation of these other documents, along with some new standards, discussed in <br /> further detail below. <br /> Content of R-M, C-C, M-U District Objective Standards <br /> Similar to the standards for Housing Element sites, these draft objective standards <br /> include an introduction followed by general development standards, site design and <br /> planning standards, and architectural features. Note that any other relevant objective <br /> standards included in the PMC (e.g., height and setback standards as specified in the <br /> underlying zoning district, parking requirements, permitted and conditionally permitted <br /> uses, water-efficient landscaping, signage, etc.) would also continue to apply to <br /> residential and mixed-use development projects. <br /> Introduction <br /> The introduction identifies that the purpose of the standards and guidelines is for <br /> residential development and mixed-use development that includes residential and <br /> references the vision statement from the Downtown Specific Plan. <br /> General development standards <br /> This section includes frontage improvements standards and site standards for <br /> downtown sites. <br /> Site design and planning standards <br /> This section identifies site circulation, building orientation, standards for alleys, paseos, <br /> vehicular and bike parking, landscape, site lighting, and utility and service area <br /> location/design. <br /> Page 6 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.