21 ATTACHMENT 7 - Laserfiche WebLink

Meghan Campbell (i FARE LLA November 30, 2022 BRAUN+MARTELiw Page 3 and listed them. Id at pp. 22-31. The Dublin/Pleasanton station failed to rank highly in any of the three categories: market readiness, local support, or infrastructure readiness including alternative parking and intermodal transit facilities. The project was shown as being a"long term""Beyond 2030"site on figure 4 (p. 25). Notably, on its"5-Year and 10-Year Development Priorities"chart, BART explained that it would only develop 1-2 stations per year, and in listing the sequence of stations that it would work on, listed thirteen stations as prioritized over the ten station group that included Dublin/Pleasanton. Dublin/Pleasanton was included in a group with nine other stations described as ones where BART plans to craft development plans in 2025-2030, only if it can obtain additional funding for staff to do so. A more recent update on BART's website confirms that"as of March 2021," development of the Dublin/Pleasanton station is not currently"in planning,"but that eight other stations are. HAC Appendix Tab 4. Pleasanton's draft housing element also isn't listening to what BART itself is saying about its plans, even if they were to go forward within the next eight years. While Pleasanton's plans for BART are for 555 units of lower income affordable housing, BART itself says it considers the capacity of all of the BART parking lots at the Dublin/Pleasanton station (both the ones on the Pleasanton side and the ones on the Dublin side)to be 557 units with 195 affordable, after taking into account the practical need for parking and intermodal facilities. BART says that it plans to develop over 550,000 square feet of commercial space on the Dublin/Pleasanton parking lots. HAC Appendix Tab 5. BART's published plan directly rejects that it will build only residential housing at the Dublin/Pleasanton station: "BART will not consider residential only development for sites shown in Figure 5 and will proactively market them to large employers, and partner with local jurisdictions to catalyze office or other job-generating uses." Meanwhile, BART's discussion of the issue has not indicated whether any potential development will be on the Dublin side or Pleasanton side. Pleasanton's housing inventory, by listing 100%of BART's parking lots for 100% affordable housing, lacks substantial evidence to conclude that BART will "likely"discontinue use of these two parcels. Pleasanton should not count on this site as meeting the need for 555 units of affordable housing during the 2023-2031 period. 2. The Kaiser Parking Lot(APN 941-1201-52-3) As the letter from East Bay for Everyone notes, the parking lot at the Kaiser Pleasanton Medical Offices is actively used by the facility, for parking. The draft inventory counts this site as providing 182 lower income units. Absent substantial evidence that the use of the parking lot is likely to discontinue—which would make little sense, given the need for doctors, nurses, patients, and lab technicians to get to this busy facility—the city cannot count the parcel towards the need for affordable housing. Building department records show extensive recent renovations. See, e.g., Pleasanton Building Department Record B22-2534(estimated $475,000 job value for tenant improvements on the Pt