Laserfiche WebLink
P20-0989, Objective Design Standards Planning Commission <br />6 of 7 <br />Note that any other relevant objective standards included in the PMC (e.g., height and setback <br />standards as specified in the underlying zoning district, parking requirements, permitted and <br />conditionally permitted uses, water-efficient landscaping, signage, etc. would also continue to <br />apply to residential and mixed-use development projects. <br /> <br />Introduction <br />The Introduction identifies that the purpose of the standards and guidelines is for residential <br />development and mixed-use development that includes residential and references the vision <br />statement from the Downtown Specific Plan. <br /> <br />General development standards <br />This section includes frontage improvements standards and site standards for downtown sites. <br />Site design and planning standards <br />This section identifies site circulation, building orientation, standards for: alleys, paseos, <br />vehicular and bike parking, landscape, site lighting, and utility and service area location/design. <br /> <br />Architectural features <br />The Architectural Features section identifies standards for building massing, façade design <br />and projections, roofs and parapets, active frontage design, building entries, historic buildings, <br />materials and details, and building signage. <br /> <br />“New” Standards <br />Although many of the draft objective standards for the R-M, C-C, and M-U District sites have <br />been incorporated from the other documents referenced above, there are some new standards <br />included to augment and bolster the body of regulations in key areas. A number of these <br />reflect similar standards included in the Draft Objective Standards for Housing Sites, because <br />they reflect principles of good design in multi-family development more generally: <br />• Vehicular and bike parking (Draft Standards 5.2 and 5.13): a standard to set maximum <br />height of partially subgrade parking; and a standard to provide a pedestrian connection <br />between front doors of ground floor businesses in mixed-use buildings and rear parking <br />lots. <br />• Landscape (Draft Standard B6.5): a standard to provide a landscape buffer for a <br />required pedestrian path between a mixed-use development and rear parking. <br />• Building massing (Draft Standards C1.1 , C1.3, and C1.6): a standard to require building <br />massing breaks but modified compared to the Housing Sites ODS to account for the <br />smaller lot size (and therefore smaller projects) downtown and on R-M, M-U, and C-C <br />District sites. Another standard that is currently in the municipal code for R-M District <br />sites would apply to multifamily residential projects in M-U and C-C Districts as well; this <br />standard requires that a new structure proposed adjacent to an existing residential <br />development set back portions of its massing taller than 15 feet such that these portions <br />are further from adjacent residential development. Also, Draft Standard C1.6 would <br />require façade articulation for sites along Main Street to allow for greater flexibility and <br />encourage arcade sidewalks. <br />• Roofs/parapets (Draft Standard C3.2): a standard to provide massing reduction through <br />roof design between new and existing single-family development or a zone where <br />single-family use is a permitted use. The roof design would be required to incorporate a <br />hipped roof, occupiable roof dormers, small gables that extend building massing to the <br />roof plane, and usable balconies recessed into the building massing.