My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2022
>
12-14
>
3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2022 3:04:41 PM
Creation date
12/7/2022 2:50:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/14/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
3_Exhibits A-G
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2022\12-14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Draft Housing Element December 14, 2022 <br />11 of 21 <br /> <br />that any sites should be considered more or less favorable based on the analysis of <br />those impact areas. <br /> <br />The DEIR identifies significant and unavoidable impacts in both Transportation and <br />Utilities and Service Systems. In terms of Utilities and Service Systems, the significant <br />and unavoidable impact relates to projected water supply, due to the recently-identified <br />PFAS issues that have caused City wells to be taken off-line, and fact the City is yet to <br />determine the most appropriate way to secure replacement water supply. The water <br />supply is not site specific, as the RHNA unit requirements does not change regardless <br />of which sites are included (i.e., the impact is driven by the number of units the City is <br />required to zone for, to meet the RHNA). <br /> <br />However, regarding Transportation, the significant and unavoidable impact relates to <br />VMTs. Many of the potential sites for rezoning are located in areas which are expected <br />to generate a home-based VMT per resident above the relevant threshold of <br />significance. While almost all sites are above the level of significance (for both project- <br />level and cumulative), some sites have relatively better VMT per capita than others. For <br />example, Area 2 (Stoneridge Mall), and several of the sites i n Hacienda have VMT per <br />capita only marginally above the threshold, whereas others are much more significantly <br />above. <br /> <br />Since this impact would be significant and unavoidable, sites which have relatively lower <br />VMTs are considered to be more favorable. Site by site projected VMT impacts are <br />noted below in Table 1. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.