My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
120622
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2022 4:04:46 PM
Creation date
11/30/2022 4:04:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/6/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton Water Quality Division's Report on <br /> Water Quality Relative to Public Health Goals 2022 <br /> June 2022 <br /> -Page 8 of 8 <br /> According to the Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) Cost Estimates for <br /> Treatment Technology BAT, to install and operate a RO system costs anywhere from $2.04- <br /> $8.04 per 1,000 gallons of water treated. Over the last 3 years, the City averaged 2.9 million <br /> gallons of water per day from their wells. To install and operate a reverse osmosis system,the <br /> cost could be as much as $10.7 million/year for the life of the system. The cost per customer <br /> service connection could be as high as $486 per year. There would also be additional costs for <br /> water conditioning to ensure water treated by reverse osmosis is optimized for distribution <br /> system corrosion control. It should also be noted that this cost estimate may be imprecise as <br /> treatment costs can vary widely depending on the particulars of the situation. It is also unclear <br /> whether treatment to below the PHG for uranium could be achieved using RO, as BATs are <br /> designed to achieve compliance only to the corresponding MCL. <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION <br /> The drinking water quality in the City of Pleasanton meets all State of California SWRCB and <br /> USEPA drinking water standards set to protect public health. To further reduce the levels of <br /> the constituents identified in this report that are already significantly below the health-based <br /> Maximum Contaminant Levels established to provide"safe drinking water,"additional costly <br /> treatment processes would be required. The effectiveness of the treatment processes to provide <br /> any significant reductions in constituent levels at these already low values is uncertain. The <br /> health protection benefits of these further hypothetical reductions are not at all clear and may <br /> not be quantifiable. Therefore, no action is proposed. <br /> The money that may or would be required for these additional treatment processes might <br /> provide greater public health protection benefits if spent on other water system operation, <br /> surveillance, and monitoring programs. <br /> REFERENCES <br /> No. 1: Table of Regulated Constituents with MCLs, PHGs or MCLGs <br /> No. 2: City of Pleasanton Public Water Utility District's 2019, 2020, 2021 Water Quality <br /> Reports <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.