My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
120622
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2022 3:37:01 PM
Creation date
11/30/2022 3:31:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/6/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As detailed in the report, staff concluded the proposed siting of the new dwellings and <br />proposed landscaping is appropriate for the subject property, is consistent with the <br />streetscape, helps mitigate the scale of the proposed development, and relates well to <br />the site and neighborhood. Additionally, the proposed dwellings are well-designed and <br />compatible with other residential development near this site. <br />It should be noted that further subdivision of this property would not be possible, since <br />lots resulting from such subdivision would not meet the minimum one -acre lot size <br />required by the NSSP.' <br />PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION <br />The Planning Commission considered the application at a public hearing on November <br />9, 2022. The Planning Commission reviewed the subject proposal in accordance with <br />the North Sycamore Specific Plan and found the proposal is consistent with its <br />regulations and design guidelines, and the architectural style and design of the homes <br />are appropriate for the North Sycamore Specific Plan Area. The Planning Commission <br />unanimously recommended the City Council approve the PUD development plan as <br />proposed and conditioned. <br />PUBLIC NOTICE <br />Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a <br />1,000 -foot radius of the site and published in the newspaper. The noticing map is <br />included as Attachment 2c. At the time this report was published, staff has received ten <br />public comments, all in support of the project. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br />This project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California <br />Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15182, Projects <br />Pursuant to a Specific Plan. <br />u m - itte Y. <br />Ellen Clark <br />Director of Community <br />Development <br />Fiscal Review: <br />Susan Hsieh <br />Director of Finance <br />Approved by: <br />Gerry Beaudin <br />City Manager <br />Attachments: <br />1.Draft City Council Ordinance for PUD Development Plan (PUD -145) <br />a. Exhibit A, Draft Conditions of Approval <br />1 The lots are also not eligible for subdivision under Senate Bill 9 (SB 9), since they have an Agricultural (A) <br />zoning, which is not considered a single-family zoning designation as required by SB 9. <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.