My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CC MIN 05172022
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2022
>
CC MIN 05172022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2022 4:57:33 PM
Creation date
11/2/2022 4:57:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/17/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
permanent open space. He noted the area was intended for grazing cattle. He questioned the integrity <br /> of the process as residents were assured in 2006 there would not be a trail through the open space. <br /> Cyndi Atherton reported on the original agreement from 2006 with neighbors like herself stating the <br /> land in question should remain open space and not include a trail. She noted her continued opposition <br /> and a lack of residential agreement on having a trail. <br /> David Yamamoto reported he agrees the Meadowlark Trail is unnecessary and the Courdet Trail met <br /> any obligation to create a trail. He stated another trail would bring increased traffic, parking issues, and <br /> fire risks. He encouraged the City to use the funds to help upgrade the parking and staging area at <br /> Alviso Adobe Community Park and add a crosswalk across Foothill Road. <br /> Michael Segundo stated the area residents, including himself, have submitted a petition in opposition to <br /> the trail. He echoed concerns about another trail in the neighborhood, including parking, traffic, safety, <br /> and redundancy created with the existing trails such as the Castleridge Trail that had not yet been <br /> conceived in 2005. He advised a CEQA study should be considered if the trail moves forward. <br /> Greg Simmons reported his initial concerns about living next to the Marilyn Kane Trail but noted fire and <br /> overcrowding risks have not been an issue in the 10 years since its construction. He stated the benefits <br /> to the entire community for building the trail far outweigh the neighbors' objections. He advised the City <br /> needs more mental and physical health opportunities for children. <br /> Terrence Chen, speaking on behalf of developer Sun Meadowlark LLC, confirmed the developer does <br /> not wish to be reimbursed if the trail is not built and advised they request the City use the funds to <br /> improve its other trails. <br /> Laura Leslie expressed her support for the trail as a resident just east of Foothill Road. She stated the <br /> trail is far enough away from the home to alleviate privacy concerns. She stated the near-by <br /> Castleridge Trail is too steep and the Meadowlark Trail a viable alternative. She stated the level of <br /> additional fire danger risk is being overblown. <br /> Les Isozaki reported he is a resident east of Foothill Road and a regular user of the Courdet and <br /> Castleridge trails. He stated he has never witnessed traffic and parking concerns unless there was an <br /> event happening. He advised the Courdet Trail has not led to any fire issues. He stated the Meadowlark <br /> Trail would benefit both new hikers and aging ones like himself. <br /> Mayor Brown closed the public hearing. <br /> In response to Councilmember Testa, Landscape Architect Gruber confirmed the City would have to <br /> perform weed abatement and other maintenance. He clarified it varies whether the developer or City is <br /> responsible for maintenance of open spaces. Interim City Manager Dolan clarified different projects <br /> have been treated differently regarding open space maintenance. He agreed there is conflicting <br /> information between a condition of approval requiring a trail and long-term residents stating it was <br /> never in the original agreement. <br /> Councilmember Testa reported the day she visited the site on a weekend that the traffic was impactful. <br /> She agreed with residents the trail will create privacy issues. She noted there have been a significant of <br /> emails received from residents stating the trails belong to all of Pleasanton and they want the trail to be <br /> built. She stated she is conflicted on the matter. <br /> In response to Councilmember Arkin, Landscape Architect Gruber clarified the proposed trail would end <br /> at Foothill Road but also have a constructed pathway connecting to the development's sidewalks. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 9 of 16 May 17,2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.