My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 0457
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
0401 - 0500
>
ORD 0457
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2004 9:01:38 AM
Creation date
10/21/1999 10:00:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 0457
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br /> ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br /> ORDINANCE NO o 457 <br /> <br /> AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF <br /> CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY, DESIGNATED <br /> AS ANNEXATION NO. 44, "AMARAL ANNE>C' <br /> <br /> The City Council does hereby ordain as follows: <br /> <br /> SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby make the following <br />findings: (a) On March 21, 1966, the Council of the City of <br />Pleasanton did pass and adopt Amended Resolution No. 66-37 giving <br />notice of the proposal to annex certain uninhabited territory to <br />the City of Pleasantono Said territory was designated as Annexa- <br />tion Noo 44,"Amaral Annex," and did describe the boundaries of <br />the territory proposed to be annexed° <br /> <br /> (b) Said Amended Resolution No. 66-37 contained a <br />notice of the time and place for the Council of the City of <br />Pleasanton to hear protests made by any person owning real proper~y <br />within the territory proposed to be annexed° Said time of said <br />hearing was not less than fifteen nor more than sixty days from <br />the date of passage of the Amended Resolution. <br /> <br /> (c) On May 9, 1966, at the hour of 8:00 PoM., in the <br />Council Chambers at the Women's Club Building, Southwest corner <br />of Vineyard and Regalia Avenues of the City of Pleasanton, County <br />of Alameda, State of California, the said City Council did con- <br />duct a public hearing and pass upon protests made, there being <br />none. By Resolution No. 66-66 the City Council determined that <br />protests had not been made by the owners of one-half of the value <br />of the privately owned territory proposed to be annexed as shown <br />by the last equalized assessment roll, nor by public owners of <br />one-half of the value of the publicly owned territory proposed <br />to be annexed as determined by said legislative body. <br /> <br />(d) Said territory is c6ntiguous to the City of <br />Pleasanton, and is uninhabited territory in the County of Alameda <br /> <br /> -1- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.