My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
110122
>
15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2022 3:44:07 PM
Creation date
10/26/2022 3:43:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/1/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Impacts and next steps. <br /> The above noted existing provisions of State Density Bonus law were used by the <br /> recently approved project at 4884 Harrison Street to achieve much higher height and <br /> density than allowed by its zoning. Should similar projects be proposed within areas <br /> determined to be "Very-Low VMT" they would similarly be able to take advantage of the <br /> additional height and density allowed by AB 2334. The extent to which additional areas <br /> of Pleasanton would meet the definition would depend on the geography used for <br /> comparison. It is noted that use of a countywide VMT per capita baseline would yield <br /> relatively fewer "low VMT" areas than if a citywide VMT per capita baseline is used, <br /> since Pleasanton, citywide, has a high VMT per capita compared to Alameda County as <br /> a whole.6 <br /> Given the community concern over the Harrison Street project, the potential for there to <br /> be more qualifying areas to receive these height and density bonuses is of significant <br /> concern, although tempered to some degree by the fact that a project also must be 100 <br /> percent affordable to qualify, which will likely limit the number of such applications. <br /> Future Legislation <br /> New legislation that may come forward in the 2023-24 legislative session is likely to <br /> include: <br /> • Plans to reduce homelessness <br /> • Addressing the growing behavioral health crisis <br /> • Ongoing housing production bills <br /> • Climate resiliency and adaptation requirements <br /> • Bolstering California's electrical grid resiliency <br /> • Bolstering innovation and technology, especially in the transit/Zero <br /> Emission Vehicle (ZEV) arena <br /> Prior to January 2023, staff will continue to work with the City Council and TPA to <br /> formulate budget requests for priority projects, brief relevant legislators and Capitol staff <br /> and revisit the City's and Tri-Valley Cities Coalition's legislative frameworks. <br /> Submitted by: �~ Approved by: <br /> Becky Hopkins Ellen Clark Gerry Beaudin <br /> Assistant to the Director of Community City Manager <br /> City Manager Development <br /> 6 It is noted that the bill states that either a City or county per capita baseline may be used but is not <br /> specific as to whether it is the City, or the developer, who "selects" the relevant baseline. <br /> Page 14 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.