Laserfiche WebLink
Sandeep Duggal spoke as a Jorgensen Lane resident in opposition to the Meadowlark Trail. He <br /> advised due process was not followed with the residents for their inability to offer input on the <br /> development. He advised the City long ago committed to keeping the space open in perpetuity. He <br /> expressed concerns about impacts to wildlife and fires from the short trail winding between 14 homes, <br /> some of which have fenceless open back yards. He requested the City Council reopen the approval <br /> process so there can be a sensible discussion of how to accommodate the needs of all involved. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> 20. PUBLIC HEARING — Review and approve the Ken Mercer Skatepark final conceptual design, <br /> CIP No. 20774, and provide direction to staff on whether to proceed further with the design or <br /> pause until construction funding is identified <br /> Assistant Director of Library and Recreation Michele Crose reported this presentation was also made to <br /> the Parks and Recreation Commission on January 13. She reported on the design process over the <br /> past year, including community surveys, public workshops, and presentations before the City Council, <br /> Youth Commission, and Parks and Recreation Commission. <br /> Richmond Rossi Montgomery (RRM) Design Group Landscape Architect Gina Chavez reported on how <br /> the community outreach shaped the proposed design which includes a street plaza style feel with <br /> skating areas for different experience levels. She advised public feedback also led to the inclusion of <br /> picnic-style gatherings, the preservation of the existing trees for shade, amenities such as a drinking <br /> fountain, and focused lighting for nighttime skating. She advised there was extensively detailed <br /> feedback helping to combine the two draft design concepts into a single preferred plan. <br /> Ms. Chavez reported the final proposed plan includes three acres of park improvements with a full acre <br /> of skateable space. She advised there will be two entrances to the skatepark- one from the main <br /> parking lot and one from the Hopyard Village shopping center. She noted the skating areas of varying <br /> ability levels, gathering spaces, spectator viewing areas, drinking fountains, bike racks, focused <br /> lighting, retention of existing perimeter landscape, and expanded parking lot with a future drop-off area. <br /> She advised there is a space retained for a potential future restroom next to the parking lot. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Ms. Chavez stated the restroom location could also be moved to the other <br /> side of the park. She clarified the two larger red blocks are shade structures for spectators and other <br /> community gatherings. <br /> Zach Wormhoudt, President of Wormhoudt Inc., reported the current skatepark is one of the oldest still <br /> in use nationally giving it a significant place within the skating world. He advised this provided cause to <br /> preserve the existing skatepark while integrating it into the proposed design. <br /> Ms. Chavez detailed the landscaping plans and a variety of plants to be incorporated with the existing <br /> greenspace. <br /> Landscape Architect Matt Gruber reported on feedback from the Parks and Recreation Commission <br /> meeting where the design was approved by a 4-2 vote. He advised the two "no" voters approved of the <br /> park's design but were concerned about the estimated $8.5 million in cost. The Commission requested <br /> adding a restroom and to look at alternative funding sources. He requested the City Council approve <br /> the design and provide direction relative to how staff should proceed until funding is identified. <br /> In response to Councilmember Arkin, Landscape Architect Gruber clarified staff would need about <br /> $50,000 to take the completed design to a bidding process. He advised there are many unknowns in <br /> the cost estimate such as change orders and inflation leading to a 42% contingency. He noted staff <br /> could see cost changes if the design was approved but the construction was tabled but noted there also <br /> could be a greater design cost if they wait to approve it. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 5 of 22 March 15,2022 <br />