My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CC MIN 03152022
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2022
>
CC MIN 03152022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2022 11:44:05 AM
Creation date
9/21/2022 11:43:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Arkin moved to approve staff's Option 2 with an amendment to specify local <br /> employees. Councilmember Testa seconded the motion. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Arkin/Testa to approve staff's recommended Workforce Housing Option 2 <br /> with an amendment to specify local employees. Motion passed by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Arkin, Balch, Testa, Mayor Brown <br /> Noes: Councilmember Narum <br /> Absent: None <br /> Senior Planner Bonn reported on staff, Planning Commission, and Housing Commission's <br /> recommendations for small-scale infill. She advised this can be done outside of the Housing Element <br /> process so staff does not want to make requisite amendments to the Municipal Code at this time. <br /> In response to Councilmember Testa, Director Clark advised it can also be included in an upcoming <br /> discussion of objective design standards. She confirmed this can be explored on a limited basis during <br /> the objective design standards discussion. <br /> In response to Councilmember Testa, Director Clark confirmed some cities have accommodated SB 9 <br /> by increasing the density of single-family residential zones. <br /> Councilmember Arkin noted courtyard-style homes and townhomes are good but advised the City does <br /> not have many of them. <br /> Councilmember Narum recommended discussion on whether to require new housing projects to have <br /> ADUs. She agreed with Councilmember Arkin's comment about the City having a lack of good starter <br /> home inventory. She expressed support for a policy of encouraging starter home construction meaning <br /> they are affordable by design due to their size and not being opulent. <br /> Director Clark explained the intent is to not over densify single-family neighborhoods but rather work <br /> with infill sites. <br /> Councilmember Balch inquired if there was support for adding something to the Housing Element <br /> without it being too narrow. Mayor Brown explained the City already does this, citing the Garden Creek <br /> duplexes, and advised policy is not needed for it. <br /> Councilmember Testa advised the entire City Council wants developments like Garden Creek but for <br /> them not to be in the middle of established single-family neighborhoods. <br /> Councilmember Narum advised the City Council needs to formally recognize the need for starter homes <br /> and get away from 2,500-3,000 square foot homes. <br /> Director Clark reported she is hearing the City Council agree to integrate affordability by-design <br /> concepts into new residential development. <br /> Mayor Brown concurred. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Director Clark clarified that ADUs are a separate policy topic. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch, Director Clark confirmed they can work affordability by-design <br /> concepts into the Housing Element rather than a formal development of new zoning standards. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 15 of 22 March 15, 2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.