CC MIN 02242022 - Laserfiche WebLink

moved the western end of downtown to District 4 for a balance, it would be a -4.86%, and District 3 would be at -6.9%, requiring additional residents. In response to Councilmember Testa's inquiry, Mr. Wagaman clarified this live map -drawing process is attempting to address the Danbury Park area issue and not the Bondi Ranch area issue. Mr. Wagaman added the Val Vista neighborhood to the Tangerine Plan's District 3 and reported the district was overpopulated by about 10%. In response to Mr. Wagaman's inquiry, Councilmember Arkin stated splitting Val Vista is not an acceptable option for the next step because it is a community of interest. She stated adding Foothill Knolls to District 1 would be a better option. Mr. Wagaman reported if they moved Foothill Knolls and Laguna Oaks into the Tangerine Plan's District 1, it would make District 3 +3.9% but District 1 would be at -12% so there would have to be a tradeoff between District 1 and District 2. Councilmember Narum noted if they cut into the Hacienda business park they are back to the Green Map where there was an objection over not running down Santa Rita Road. Councilmember Balch noted the map they are drawing is similar to the Cherry Plan. Mr. Wagaman confirmed the map being drawn live is similar to the Cherry Plan and noted the difference is primarily between how Districts 3 and 4 incorporate downtown and the area north of Sycamore Road. Councilmember Balch stated he will attempt to build support for the Cherry Plan based on where the live map drawing's direction is heading. He stated it was his third choice but is seeing if it could find consensus. He stated he has a challenge with Bondi Ranch and Ironwood. He added he heard one of his peers call for alignment along Hopyard Road and this plan uses it. He added it does what Councilmember Arkin was attempting to do west of 1-680 but does not dip down into Laguna Oaks. He stated he still thinks the Lime Plan is superior but added the Cherry Plan has some of the components mentioned by others and could work for the greater good. Mayor Brown expressed appreciation for the attempt at collaboration and the complexity of Mr. Wagaman's work. In response to Mayor Brown's inquiry, City Attorney Sodergren stated first they would need a motion and vote on a specific map followed by a discussion of sequencing so the matter can come back at the next meeting for the first reading of an ordinance. Councilmember Balch moved to approve the Cherry Plan. Councilmember Narum seconded the motion. MOTION: It was m/s by Balch/Narum to approve the Cherry Plan as recommended and as noted. Motion failed by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Balch, Narum Noes: Councilmembers Arkin, Testa, Mayor Brown Absent: None Councilmember Arkin stated she could be content with the Cherry Plan with some modifications City Council Minutes Page 8 of 14 February 24, 2022