My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CC MIN 02152022
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2022
>
CC MIN 02152022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2022 3:34:45 PM
Creation date
9/7/2022 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Deborah Insel echoed Ms. Boggs' comments. She thanked the Spotorno family, Planning Commission, <br />and City staff for their work on the path along Alisal Street for pedestrian protection. She added they will <br />no longer have to walk in the road. She encouraged the Council to approve the plan. <br />Steve Mix expressed support for the plan. He added there are concerns on the neighborhood's narrow <br />streets about vehicular traffic, particularly the trucks and cars coming for construction. He requested the <br />Council put the traffic mitigation plans and walking path along Alisal Street into the early part of the <br />construction process. He encouraged the Council to get the community involved. <br />Dave Muller expressed his support for the project and commended the work of the Planning <br />Commission. He noted how difficult the work of the Council is balancing the City's charm against the <br />need to grow, relating tales from working with the City to approve Sunflower Hill at Irby Ranch. He <br />stated the landowners and Planning Commission got it right in putting together a thoughtful <br />development that will blend in nicely, add trails, and help with affordable housing through ADUs. <br />Becky Dennis supports the project noted how it meets the City's CAP 2.0 ideals, stating it is forward - <br />thinking and the future face of agriculture. She thanked the Spotorno family for bringing this project <br />forward and congratulated them on their work. She stated it is fitting this development and the approval <br />of CAP 2.0 are on the same agenda. <br />Sean Tregear noted Alisal Street has been addressed but not either Happy Valley Road or Sycamore <br />Road which both feed the community. He reported Happy Valley Road is narrow with no sidewalks and <br />is getting beaten up by heavy traffic use. He cautioned about pedestrian and bicyclist dangers. He <br />requested focus on enhancing the safety of Happy Valley Road and Sycamore Road. He expressed <br />concerns about drainage into the creek running through his property and added it has caused erosion <br />issues. He inquired about the timeline of the project. <br />In response to Mayor Brown, Interim City Manager Brian Dolan confirmed much of Happy Valley is <br />owned by Alameda County including much of Alisal Street. Traffic Engineer Tassano added the County <br />did traffic calming for Happy Valley around 2018. He added the City worked with the County and paid <br />for the Alisal Street traffic calming measures when the Callippe Preserve Golf Course was created. <br />Jocelyn Combs stated this project has been a long time in the making. She expressed support for <br />provisions about ADUs, the Low -Income Housing Fee, and compliance with CAP 2.0. She thanked all <br />involved with the project and encouraged the Council to support the project. <br />Mike Bailey inquired if the lots will be on the City's well and sewer system, asked where water will be <br />channeled out of the development, requested more information on common lot usage, asked how an <br />HOA would work concerning SB 9, asked if the bio -retention area will look the same as it does now, <br />and asked about the viability of a three-way stop sign where Spotorno Ranch Road meets Alisal Street. <br />Director Clark confirmed the development will be connected to the City's water and sewer system, the <br />water channeling has no net increase in runoff due to improved storm drainage, the bio -retention area <br />will see added landscaping and engineering of the basin, and the HOA could choose to limit additional <br />subdivision under SB 9. She added the third parcel is the open space. <br />In response to Councilmember Testa, Director Clark clarified ADU laws and SB 9 are separate laws but <br />related. She clarified if an HOA restricts SB 9 splits it can limit the total number of ADUs within the <br />development to one per property. A second ADU would have to be an accessory to a primary structure. <br />A Junior ADU is a separate question because it is the interior space of a home and not a new structure. <br />Erin Sorgel stated she is not excited about the development expressing concerns for her young children <br />about the traffic increases to come near her home on Sycamore Road. She stated the development <br />City Council Minutes Page 8 of 16 February 15, 2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.