My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
090622
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2022 2:05:03 PM
Creation date
8/31/2022 2:04:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
yet been submitted. Test drilling atthe Amador Valley Community Park location was <br />completed in March 2022. <br />DISCUSSION <br />The next steps for advancing the project includes the prepurchase of PFAS treatment <br />vessels and installation of Well 9 and 10 casings in early 2023 with an estimated <br />construction cost of $5.2 million and $2.4 million, respectively. However, before <br />proceeding with the project, there are several reasons the City may wantto considera <br />regional water supply option as noted below: <br />• The project cost estimate was last prepared in June 2021 and is currently being <br />updated to reflect currenteconomic conditions. Although not yet completed, itis <br />anticipated the cost estimate may increase up to 30 percent due to the impact of <br />recent inflation trends on the bidding market. <br />• The City currently does not own or operate a water treatment plant and the PFAS <br />treatment facility will require additional staff and have significant annual <br />operational costs for treatment media procurementand disposal. These are <br />substantial long-term costs to be directed at only 20 percent of the city's water <br />supply. <br />• A changing regulatory environmentwill continue to add uncertaintyand potential <br />liabilityto the City as it will be responsible for contaminant removal from the <br />water it produces. <br />• Acceptable contaminant levels are declining and may require continual changes <br />in treatment techniques and technologies to meet requirements. <br />Given the above, staff recommends suspending project implementation before incurring <br />the initial well and vessel costs to allow additional time to evaluate alternatives. <br />CONCLUSION <br />Staff recommends the City suspend implementation of the PFAS Treatment and Wells <br />Rehabilitation Project at this time to furtherevaluate alternatives. <br />Submitted by: Fiscal Review <br />rc,..,,. 11Etiy l - <br />L <br />Tamara Baptista Susan Hsieh <br />Interim Director of Operations Finance Director <br />and Water Utilities <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Approved by: <br />Gerry Beaudin <br />City Manager <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.