My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
090622
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2022 2:03:26 PM
Creation date
8/31/2022 2:02:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Input Survey Cricket Field Location Options at Ken Mercer Sports Park <br />The range of the balls that may go in any direction also has to make one question the safety of <br />people walking on the sidewalks, standing with their back to play at the snack bar, and even <br />people in the snackbar not paying attention to the game. The circle painted out by the city <br />shows the window of the snack bar only about 50 feet from the field of play. Cricket balls are <br />hard as rocks and they bounce. A person hit in the head by one of these balls would be <br />seriously injured. We will need to build a solid fence around the entire cricket playing field to <br />protect people in this congested areas. The homeowners along the south edge of the park are <br />also currently impacted by cricket balls and baseballs coming over our fences. How can this <br />be if only kids play on the the existing baseball diamond that is restricted to kids 15 years and <br />under? Lets just say that some of the 15 year old kids in Pleasanton are really big. Keep in <br />mind that the two fields under discussion are not just used by football. There is a lot of activity <br />throughout the year at this location. This option is a terrible idea and will only make a bad <br />situation worse. <br />58 Too close to residences next to the park. <br />59 Too big <br />60 Again, why have a pitch that can only accommodate youth cricket? <br />61 This seems like a terrible location. Not only does it impact the only two football fields, but it <br />would need netting on all four sides. It is especially concerning that it is near a playground, <br />bathrooms and volleyball court, which are all used by children. The children could be very hurt <br />by the cricket ball (definitely if adults play). It also endangers the walkers on the path, as the <br />path is on all 4 sides of the pitch. Even though it is designated for youths, adults will definitely <br />use it, which will endanger walkers, property and possibly children. Please do not choose this <br />location. <br />62 Is there enough parking available to option three site? Does it also provide the availability for <br />building a separate pitching and batting practice Lane? <br />63 Option 3 is wide open grass area and does not interfere with softball: baseball or soccer field . <br />GREAT OPTION #3 <br />64 <br />65 <br />66 <br />67 <br />Worst possible location. Impacts to nearby homes can't be mitigated by netting or other <br />measures. This location would present the greatest potential for future conflicts with <br />residences. <br />Too close to the walking path, and nets would be ugly. Also any kid only park would likely be <br />used by adults and cause fly balls to go into the walk way which is on 3 sides of this location <br />and hit people. <br />A little farther from sidewalk than option 2. No infrastructure concerns just scheduling with <br />football. <br />Same as before <br />68 Could you change to a low residential density park? This park is already heavily occupied by <br />different sports events from early morning to night time. The noise pollution to the nearby <br />neighborhood is already huge. This project better to be built in a low density <br />area/neighborhood. Thanks for your consideration. <br />69 Too close to residential area. Worsening the traffic and parking. <br />70 We walk this park every day in my opinion this is the most underutilized area of the park. The <br />only sports played in this area is spill over sports when the other fields are busy. I rarely see <br />football played here and I'm confident that the two sports can share the fields. Don't believe <br />what the football folks are telling you about how much they use the fields. And no I'm not a <br />cricket player. <br />71 Don't build it <br />72 Too close to pathway Pedestrians at risk!!! <br />73 The option of cricket field is unsafe too. Crickets are hard balls and the potential field is too <br />close to the houses and other fields. Sports park is high traffic park and the location is <br />dangerous for the people nearby. <br />74 Unsafe and noise for neighborhood <br />22/37 <br />6/30/2022 11:24 AM <br />6/3012022 5:56 AM <br />6/30/2022 12:22 AM <br />6/29/2022 8:10 PM <br />6/29/2022 5:09 PM <br />6/29/2022 1:27 PM <br />6/29/2022 8:42 AM <br />6/28/2022 8:27 PM <br />6/28/2022 3:41 PM <br />6128/2022 1:51 PM <br />6/28/2022 1:50 PM <br />6/28/2022 11:34 AM <br />6/28/2022 10:01 AM <br />6/28/2022 9:02 AM <br />6/28/2022 8:50 AM <br />6/2812022 7:18 AM <br />6/28/2022 6:12 AM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.