12 - Laserfiche WebLink

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Community Input Survey Cricket Field Location Options at Ken Mercer Sports Park Spacious seems easiest to create versus other two locations Not a good location for Ken Mercer Sports Park. There is already insufficient parking for this park. Traffic spills onto Parkside Drive, created danger for pedestrians walking between vehicles parked on Parkside Drive, due to the increase of speeding vehicles inside the park and on Parkside Dr. This field should not be put at Mercer park, but at Bernal park which has sufficient parking that is outside of a residential community. Might be ok if it was moved in so the radius is farther away from the walkway. Softball diamond would be eliminated regardless of placement, so why not use common sense & accomodate both adult & youth in this location with a buffer zone between the adult radius & walkways. No point in setting the city up for litigation when someone gets an ankle clipped due to poorly designed placement of the pitch. How about bocce ball Option 2 is a good second choice. My concern would be that people ages 12 and up would use this field and it could become dangerous. I believe a fence is necessary for games. Maybe something portable that's similar to what is used during a softball game. Too used with other sports Please move out of the city to do this Better than option 3 as it is more mid -park where other fields already are. Takes away from an existing sport field too large of an impact on other sports Too close to existing sidewalks Needs to be larger to include adult and youth, unless you do both option 1 & 2 I don't like this location. Adult cricket preferably It is a good option only if other options do not work out. It will be uneven terrine and impact baseball field and cricket field We want to have minimal disruption. Prefer to have pitch in option 3 due to no baseball pitch near that location. Again putting it near other multi use field will create a "turf' war with all the leagues See Above I respond yes to this one as long as the youth cricket and youth baseball can come inside in the same space. The cricket and baseball field should be dual use. We shouldn't have to get rid of a baseball field in order to have a cricket only field. It seems that a sports field designer should be able to figure out a way to make them dual use. While this is a better choice that #3, the pitch would potentially affect two paths and has limited use to only youth. Given our changing population and popularity of cricket, build both option #1 and #2 at the same time. The time has come where there are likely more kids in the community who are cricket players, or will be, than traditional "American" sports. It's time we embrace this change and be the city of planned progress as we like to claim and provide facilities for this population. It's not baseball, football and softball at a sports park anymore. If we justify spending a ton of money on a skatepark that services a small part of the population, we should spend equal time and effort in a cricket pitch that far more people will use. No because too close to walkways See prior comments This is too close to the homes and walkways. 13/37 7/8/2022 5:19 PM 7/8/2022 5:14 PM 7/8/2022 4:59 PM 7/8/2022 4:47 PM 7/8/2022 4:30 PM 7/8/2022 4:26 PM 7/8/2022 4:19 PM 7/8/2022 4:07 PM 7/8/2022 3:28 PM 7/8/2022 3:20 PM 7/8/2022 3:19 PM 7/8/2022 3:11 PM 7/8/2022 11:45 AM 7/8/2022 9:06 AM 7/7/2022 10:54 PM 7/7/2022 9:13 PM 717/2022 9:01 PM 7/7/2022 5:19 PM 7/7/2022 4:47 PM 7/7/2022 3:37 PM 7/5/2022 11:24 PM 7/4/2022 12:24 PM 7/4/2022 9:41 AM 7/3/2022 12:13 PM 7/2/2022 9:57 PM 7/2/2022 10:11 AM 7/2/2022 9:51 AM