17 - Laserfiche WebLink

• Review of comparable mall redevelopment project examples, and identification of elements applicable or appropriate to Stoneridge Mall. • Development of alternative Framework land use concepts to respond to identified existing conditions, constraints, and opportunities. • Creation of a Final Framework Plan and accompanying supporting documents including land use concept and initial designations (including quantities of various land uses); circulation and infrastructure concept, including parking; public realm and placemaking concept, including publicly-accessible open space; and architectural standards/design guidance framework. • Creation of a Phased Redevelopment Strategy identifying subsequent implementation steps (e.g., development of a specific plan or master plan), CEQA analysis, potential zoning or code amendments, and actions to be undertaken by the City and property owners to allow for entitlements to be pursued by property owners/developers. Public and Stakeholder Process Despite a relatively accelerated timeline, the Framework process will provide several opportunities for City Council, Planning Commission, and public input. It also invites the key property owners at the mall to participate in a series of planning sessions with staff to understand their various interests and goals and weigh in on a draft and final framework. Expected meetings include: • Three City Council Meetings, including this initial scope discussion, and meetings to review and provide input on the Draft and Final Framework. Meetings of the Planning Commission will also be scheduled to consider the Draft and Final Framework. • Up to three Property Owner Roundtable Meetings to introduce the Framework process and goals, and review Draft and Final Framework. • Two Community Workshops held either in person or via Zoom, to provide input on the Draft and Final Framework. Professional Services Team Staff recommends using a professional services team to assist with this effort, to provide technical expertise and input, and to supplement available staff capacity. Attachment 2 outlines the scope of work to be undertaken by the primary consultant on the project, Van Meter Williams Pollack. Their work will be supported by two technical consultants, Economics & Planning Systems (EPS), with respect to market and fiscal considerations, and Fehr & Peers, with respect to traffic and transportation. EPS' and Fehr & Peers' draft scopes of work are included as Attachments 3 and 4, respectively. Estimated total costs for these services, include up to $75,000 for VMWP; $55,090 for EPS, and $46,400 for Fehr & Peers, for a total estimated cost of approximately $176, 490. If the City Council approves the overall scope of work as outlined in this agenda Page 7 of 8