My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CC MIN 02082022
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2022
>
CC MIN 02082022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2022 12:18:27 PM
Creation date
8/17/2022 12:18:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/8/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Balch clarified 150 units is his intent and he is trying to reach it with staffs guidance <br /> about needing to have a range to meet HCD standards. He advised he is open to a friendly amendment <br /> but explained they need to have a range to hit the targeted midpoint. <br /> Councilmember Arkin clarified she would like to see 150 units be the top end of the range. <br /> Director Clark stated a range of 8 to 14 units per acre would yield 142 at the top end but would also <br /> have a lower assumed capacity. <br /> Councilmember Balch advised he would like to see if they have the votes without the amendment for <br /> the 8 to 20 units per acre range. <br /> Mayor Brown agreed 200 units seems like a large number but advised it does not mean the city Council <br /> is approving it. She expressed her belief the traffic study will show First Street is highly impacted <br /> making it difficult to build 200 units. She noted this site is harder to work on and so many other sites will <br /> be easier. She encouraged the Councilmembers to work hard towards a compromise. <br /> Councilmember Balch reported he does not mind trying to get 150 as a target but clarified he is working <br /> within the framework staff is requesting the City Council adhere to. He noted if they reduce the density <br /> too much it may work against PUSD's goals for the site. He explained if the density is too low it may not <br /> achieve the goal of producing workforce housing for teachers. <br /> Mayor Brown advised it is a large site at 10.7 acres so she foresees having units of a variety of sizes. <br /> Councilmember Balch agreed but left himself unsure of where it leaves the City Council. <br /> Councilmember Narum expressed confusion regarding the commercial component. She expressed <br /> concerns noting all commercial spaces added near the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station in the <br /> last housing cycle which have remained empty for years. She advised she is open to allowing <br /> commercial uses but would not like to mandate it due to the potential for slow leasing. <br /> Councilmember Balch advised his motion did not include a commercial element, noting the commercial <br /> vacancies on Main Street. <br /> Councilmember Narum inquired if Councilmember Balch is open to an option for commercial usage <br /> even just for a small neighborhood store. <br /> Mayor Brown advised she does not want a 7-Eleven in this space. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Director Clark clarified sites listed with a specific number and not a range <br /> are those where the City has a developer's proposal or where the site is not conducive to a range. She <br /> advised it would be better, especially for reuse sites, to have a range. She noted the City regularly <br /> allows for mixed density across a site so long as the aggregate density does not exceed the maximum. <br /> She advised this could allow for a combination of denser workforce-oriented units alongside single- <br /> family houses or townhouses on the site. <br /> Councilmember Arkin suggested changing the density range to 8 to 16 units. Director Clark reported <br /> this would make the capacity assumption 122 units. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch, Director Clark confirmed they can state there is an allowance for <br /> blended densities on the site. <br /> Councilmember Balch agreed to amend his motion to make the density range 8 to 16 units. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 8 of 27 February 8, 2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.