My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
6
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN AND TRAILS
>
2022
>
08222022
>
6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2023 4:42:27 PM
Creation date
8/16/2022 3:30:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br />Parks and Recreation Master Plan process that identified the renovation of Lions Wayside and <br />Delucchi parks as one of the most significant improvements that the City should pursue. Staff <br />also identified the regulatory challenges that were possible in undergrounding the drainage <br />channel. City Council directed staff to pursue the option that proposed undergrounding the <br />channel and the City adopted the master plan on October 7, 2014. <br /> <br />Design After Adoption of Master Plan <br />On June 3, 2014, the City contracted with AECOM to provide the necessary environmental and <br />permit application consulting services. Undergrounding the channel required the City to secure <br />permits from government agencies with jurisdiction over natural resources and review the <br />project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). To satisfy permitting and <br />CEQA requirements, the City, with consultant assistance, prepared a Draft Initial <br />Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) to accompany the permitting package for the <br />project. <br /> <br />Upon receiving the IS/MND, the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Army Corps <br />of Engineers (ACE), and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) all expressed <br />concern regarding the proposed undergrounding of 533 linear feet of Kottinger Creek in Lions <br />Wayside Park. The agencies were concerned with the potential loss of riparian habitat and <br />impacts on surrounding watersheds. Due to these concerns, each of the agencies indicated they <br />would not issue permits based on the submitted design and plans for Lions Wayside and <br />Delucchi Parks. <br /> <br />In November 2017, in response to permitting agency feedback, the City substantially revised the <br />conceptual design to reduce impacts on Kottinger Creek and enhance segments of the <br />channelized stream while still meeting the City's objectives of augmenting the appearance and <br />use of the parks, upgrading an important downtown recreational amenity, and improving park <br />safety. Compared to the previously submitted design, the new design significantly reduced <br />impacts on Kottinger Creek but upon review by the RWQCB, this redesign was also determined <br />to be unacceptable for meeting the objectives and standards of the agency, and therefore, the <br />RWQCB did not support the redesign. <br /> <br />Taking into consideration the feedback and perspectives of the various permitting agencies <br />regarding the section of Kottinger Creek in Lions Wayside Park, staff initiated the process of <br />modifying the originally adopted design of Lions Wayside Park to achieve the intended goals <br />outlined in the Master Plan, while conforming to the standards and guidelines that would be <br />necessary to secure permits from the various local permitting agencies. <br /> <br />Design Alternatives <br />The City’s consultants prepared four potential design alternatives that attempted to meet these <br />goals. The design alternatives contained varying replacement locations for the existing Chan <br />Henderson bandstand to maximize seating for event participants, as well as including the <br />regional trail through the parks and other aesthetic and design improvements meant to increase <br />efficiency and access to park features. Of the four alternative concepts, Council directed staff to <br />further study three of the options and to present the designs to the Parks and Recreation <br />Commission for review, to develop a final draft design that would meet the needs of the <br />permitting agencies. The three options were:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.