Laserfiche WebLink
likely that the number of RHNA units transferred will in all likelihood be less than the unit <br /> counts noted in the sites analysis (since development in the County could not occur at a <br /> similar density without annexation and connection to City utilities), the above-moderate <br /> inventory is nonetheless sized to accommodate such a potential transfer. <br /> It is also noted that the sites listed under Appendix B are being analyzed in the CEQA <br /> process which, in addition to flexibility through the Housing Element process, may help <br /> address "no net loss" provisions of state law2. The City could use this broader list as an <br /> inventory of potential additional sites that are not included in the Housing Element at the <br /> time of adoption, but eligible to be considered at a future date for rezoning if needed, <br /> that have already been through the necessary CEQA review. <br /> Appendix C - Housing Constraints Analysis: Analyzes and recommends remedies <br /> for existing and potential governmental and nongovernmental barriers to housing <br /> development. Figure 3 illustrates these components, as addressed in Appendix C. This <br /> appendix was previously reviewed by the Council but includes very minor clarifications <br /> and edits to the text to respond to feedback. <br /> Figure 3: Housing Constraints Assessment Contents <br /> Housing Constraints Assessment <br /> Governmental Constraints Non-Governmental Environmental and <br /> • Land use controls Constraints Infrastructure Constraints <br /> (e.g.,zoning) • Housing supply/conditions • Environmental constraints(e.g., <br /> • Permits and procedures • Development cost flood zone,soil contamination) <br /> • On and off-site improvements • Availability of financing • Infrastructure constraints(e.g., <br /> sewer,stormwater) <br /> Appendix D - Existing Programs Evaluation and Review: Reviews the prior Housing <br /> Element to measure progress in implementing policies and programs. This appendix <br /> evaluates which programs were successful and should be continued, and which <br /> programs were ineffective and should be removed or modified. Examples of <br /> recommended modifications include integrating changes to reflect state law updates <br /> (e.g., no net loss (SB 166), Housing Crisis Act (SB 330), supportive housing, <br /> emergency shelters, etc.) and providing more specificity in terms of City actions. This <br /> appendix was previously reviewed by the Council but includes modifications to more <br /> closely reflect the array of revised programs included in Section 4 of the Housing <br /> Element document. <br /> 2"No net loss"provisions are a component of the Housing Accountability Act, which, whenever a project is <br /> approved with few units, or less affordability than cited in the Housing Element, requires findings to be made that <br /> adequate zoning capacity remains in the inventory to accommodate the units not built, or for the City to re-zone <br /> additional sites to accommodate that number of units. <br /> Page 10 of 18 <br />