Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT1 <br />ORDINANCE <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />PLEASANTON APPROVING THE PLEASANTON POLICE <br />DEPARTMENT'S MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY <br />WHEREAS, On September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law <br />Assembly Bill 481 ("AB 481 ") to regulate the use of military equipment by law <br />enforcement agencies; and <br />WHEREAS, AB 481, codified at California Government Code sections 7070 <br />through 7075, requires law enforcement agencies to obtain approval of the applicable <br />governing body, by an ordinance adopting a "military equipment" use policy at a regular <br />meeting held pursuant to open meeting laws prior to taking certain actions relating to <br />the funding, acquisition, or use of "military equipment." The term "military equipment" is <br />defined in California Government Code Section 7070, and <br />WHEREAS, AB 481 allows the City Council to approve the funding, acquisition, <br />or use of military equipment, within its jurisdiction only if it makes specified <br />determinations; and <br />WHEREAS, the Military Equipment Use Policy is attached as Exhibit "A"; and <br />WHEREAS, the Military Equipment Use Policy was published on Pleasanton <br />Police Department's Internet Website on April 30, 2022, more than 30 days before the <br />Military Use Policy was first considered at a public hearing before the City Council on <br />June 7, 2022; and <br />WHEREAS, the Military Equipment Use Policy meets the requirements of <br />California Government Code section 7070. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: <br />Section 1. Recitals. The City Council finds that the above recitals are true and <br />correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. <br />Section 2. Findings. The City Council approves the Military Use Policy based <br />on the following findings: <br />A. The military equipment identified in the Military Equipment Use Policy is <br />necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same <br />objective of officer and civilian safety; and <br />