My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CC MIN 02012022
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2022
>
CC MIN 02012022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2022 8:19:41 AM
Creation date
6/14/2022 8:19:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/1/2022
EXPIRATION DATE
2/1/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
deadline for adoption of the Housing Element is January 2023 although there is a 120-day grace <br /> period. She provided a brief overview of the timeline including past and upcoming events. She <br /> explained there have been some recent changes in state law that provided the Department of Housing <br /> and Community Development (HCD) more time for review and is pushing out the City's grace period. <br /> Ms. Clark provided a brief overview of the site selection process to date. She reported staff identified 29 <br /> initial sites and density assumptions. She advised conducting Planning Commission and public review. <br /> She reported the list has been reviewed by the Planning Commission and Housing Commission and <br /> community workshops were held. She reported on December 15th the Planning Commission made its <br /> final recommendation to the City Council for review today. <br /> The City's Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) number is 5,965 units distributed across various <br /> income categories and the City must show to the State the City can meet that need in each category. <br /> She reported the existing zoning capacity shortfall is 3,143 units. She explained the final Housing <br /> Element site inventory will go through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), onto the HCD for <br /> review and refinement of final sites, and back to the City Council for final adoption in early 2023. <br /> Staff recommends adding 50 percent more units than the identified gap to provide flexibility to adjust <br /> sites based on successive inputs during the review process. She explained the importance of having an <br /> appropriate balance of density ranges and housing types for each site. She advised high-density sites <br /> must be developed at a minimum of 30 units per acre and low and medium-density sites will be <br /> . developed at the average density within the range per HCDs guidance. She provided local examples of <br /> density ranges. <br /> Ms. Clark provided a brief overview of High-Density Housing. She reported in the last Housing Element, <br /> the City opted to allow a maximum of 30 —40 units per acre in High Density. She advised the Planning <br /> and Housing Commission's consensus is that zoning above 30-40 units per acre in appropriate <br /> locations could accommodate RHNA more efficiently, improve design outcomes, encourage the <br /> production of smaller and more affordable units, and make projects more financially feasible. She noted <br /> that design and environmental impacts must be carefully reviewed. She provided examples of High- <br /> Density Housing. <br /> Ms. Clark reported 29 sites have been identified and assigned a preliminary density range. She <br /> provided a brief overview of the sites including their density ranges and locations. She reported the total <br /> estimated zoning capacity if all 29 sites were developed would be 6,629 units. She noted the City <br /> Council has the flexibility to pare down that list and take some sites out of consideration. <br /> Ms. Clark explained the framework for how each site was ranked and scored based on the Sites <br /> Criteria approved by the City Council. She advised other factors and policy considerations will come <br /> into play during the process that will elevate or reduce the desirability of some sites over others <br /> including community support, property owner support, land-use compatibility, the feasibility of <br /> development, and geographic location and distribution. <br /> The Planning Commission was supportive of consideration for increasing densities on some of the sites <br /> and increasing the maximum density on existing Housing Element sites. Ms. Clark advised their initial <br /> feedback was to keep Site 28: Steelwave and Site 20: Boulder Court, Remove Site 26: St. Augustine <br /> and Site 13: Pimlico South as recommended by staff, and deprioritize/eliminate Sites 17: Mission Plaza <br /> and Site 18: Valley Plaza. <br /> A Community Workshop was held on December 1 and noted there were concerns regarding <br /> displacement of existing uses and loss of small business and concerns of overall infrastructure capacity <br /> such as increased traffic, water supply and quality, and school capacity. Ms. Clark noted there was <br /> support for sites near Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) or transportation. She advised the community <br /> City Council Minutes Page 13 of 16 February 1,2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.