My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
060722
>
04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2022 3:43:26 PM
Creation date
6/2/2022 3:37:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/7/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study <br />August 2021 │ Final 29 <br /> <br />transit. Other technology strategies include integrating adaptive ramp metering and/or corridor/incident <br />management systems which can help improve the efficiency and safety of the transportation system. <br />Project C-15: Technology Enhancements proposes to provide connectivity for transit and vehicles between <br />local arterials and regional facilities. The project is expected to be completed in three phases - Feasibility, <br />Design, and Construction. The TVTDF will help fund the feasibility study phase of the study, since the <br />details of the design and construction phase are unknown at this time. The feasibility study will focus on the <br />first and last mile connectivity opportunities at key transit hubs and along major transit routes in the Tri- <br />Valley area. Leveraging existing and emerging technology, such as connected and autonomous vehicles, <br />may help increase safety and mobility for all modes. These technologies may also help with increasing <br />transit ridership or expanding transit service to less-served areas, especially for communities that currently <br />lack service. Given that the resultant projects are intended to offset the impacts of future development, the <br />feasibility study is appropriate to include in the TVTC project list. <br />4.4 BURDEN RELATIONSHIP <br />The need for the TVTDF is based on the forecasted increase in congestion on routes of regional significance <br />as well as other transportation impacts resulting from new development. Consistent with the methodology <br />from the 2008, the contribution by each land use was based on the proportion of average AM/PM trips <br />generated by each land use. As demonstrated in this Study, there is a reasonable relationship between the <br />need for the planned projects and the types of development upon which the fee is imposed because the <br />planned projects will mitigate the transportation impacts of said new development. <br />4.4.1 TRIP RATE <br />The 2008 Nexus Study used the 7th Edition of Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)’s Trip Generation <br />Handbook to develop the trip rates for each land use category. Since then, three additional editions of the <br />Trip Generation Handbook have been published for use, ending with the most recent 10th Edition. It was <br />determined that for all categories except the ‘Other’ category, the trip rates would be developed using the <br />10th Edition rather than the 7th Edition for this update. In addition, consistent with the 2008 Nexus Study, <br />the trip rates were developed based on adjacent street traffic rather than peak -hour of generator. A 30- <br />percent reduction was also taken for retail trips to account for pass-by trips, consistent with the 2008 Nexus <br />Study. Table 21 below summarizes the comparison in average AM and PM peak-hour trip rates by land <br />use type. As shown in Table 21, every land use category results in a lower trip rate using the 10th Edition <br />when compared to the 7th Edition. <br />Table 21: AM/PM Peak-Hour Average Trip Rate Comparison Between 7th Edition and 10th Edition <br />Land Use Type 7th Edition Average <br />Trip Rate <br />10th Edition Average <br />Trip Rate Difference <br />Single-Family Residential 0.90 0.87 -0.03 <br />Multi-Family Residential 0.62 0.51 -0.11 <br />Retail 1.67 1.66 -0.01 <br />Office 1.53 1.16 -0.37 <br />Industrial 0.89 0.67 -0.22 <br />Other 1.00 1.00 0.00
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.