Laserfiche WebLink
6. Continued — Discussion regarding Proposed Ballot Measure 21-0016 Amendment 1 which <br /> Provides that Local Land Use and Zoning Laws Override Conflicting State Laws, and Consider <br /> Taking a Position <br /> 7. Clarification of elements of a long-term parklet program <br /> Mayor Brown reported there was a discussion about the parklet program at the last City Council <br /> meeting and many of them are presently being dismantled ahead of the January 7 deadline. <br /> Associate Planner Megan Campbell requested additional clarification on the City Council's direction <br /> regarding the width of parklets, wheel stop locations, and the timing. <br /> Associate Planner Campbell reported staff understood that the City Council wished to maximize the <br /> parklet space while accounting for traffic safety. Traffic engineering staff further studied the issue and <br /> has determined an eight-foot parklet would be acceptable while maintaining the 12-foot minimum travel <br /> lane width on Main Street. Anything wider than eight feet makes Main Street travel difficult for vehicles <br /> to enter and exit street parking spaces. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch, Associate Planner Campbell confirmed staff measured the outer <br /> edge of the street parking spaces and they are eight feet from the curb. <br /> Associate Planner Campbell clarified a minimum of three feet is required from wheel stops to a parklet <br /> but noted staff also heard concerns over these shortening the potential length of parklets if located <br /> within a parklet's parking space. Staff suggested wheel stops can be located in adjacent parking or <br /> buffer spaces allowing parklets to be built out to the boundaries of their parking spaces without <br /> impacting traffic or parklet-adjacent parking. <br /> Associate Planner Campbell reported staff understood that City Council requested a design review <br /> path, and parklet installation could begin on March 1. She provided a proposed timeline to meet this <br /> date and reported the City's pre-approved design should be ready on April 1 and recommends approval <br /> of the timeline. <br /> In response to Mayor Brown, Councilmember Balch clarified the March 1 date is for parklets going <br /> through a design review process so they could be in place ahead of when the City's pre-approved <br /> design is ready. Associate Planner Campbell advised staff would stick to the design guidelines given to <br /> the architect for the parklets going through design review. Interim City Manager Dolan expressed his <br /> opinion there is enough specificity in the guidelines to allow for individual design review. He advised it is <br /> more work for the applicant but allows the City to accommodate those eager to have their parklet <br /> before the April 1 pre-approved design release. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch, Associate Planner Campbell confirmed the timeline allows a <br /> sufficient window for needed tree pruning and street maintenance ahead of the return of parklets. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch, Associate Planner Campbell confirmed staff considered making <br /> the parklet size uniform regardless of whether it was in one of downtown's 18 or 24-foot parking <br /> spaces. She reported staff heard City Council's direction as maximizing the potential parklet space by <br /> allowing all 24 feet to be filled in those spots but added they can restrict the parklet to 18 feet even in a <br /> 24-foot space. <br /> Councilmember Balch noted if the parklets are uniform in length at 18 feet, in a 24-foot parking space <br /> the wheel stops do not have to be in adjacent parking spaces. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 5 of 10 January 4. 2022 <br />