Laserfiche WebLink
Cities of Dublin and Pleasanton | Disaster Debris Management Plan | 2022 <br />6 <br /> <br />Severe <br />Weather .5 1 .5 <br />Vegetative, C&D, <br />Hazardous Waste, <br />HHW , <br />White Goods, Soil, <br />Mud, Sand, <br />Vehicles, Household <br />Items, <br />Soil, Mud, and Rock <br />from Mud Flows, <br />Electronic Waste <br />Low Low <br /> <br />During an actual disaster, many factors impact the actual amount of debris generated. The <br />information in this section is intended for planning and will likely be different from a real incident. <br /> <br />1.4.2 Debris Estimates <br />Estimating the quantities of debris that may be generated by various natural or man-made disasters <br />is a complex process. There are endless variables (type of incident, severity, etc.) that can <br />dramatically impact the quantities of debris that may be generated by a disaster. Virtually no model <br />that can estimate debris volumes and types with a high degree of certainty. However, debris volume <br />estimates can be used as a resource when planning for a debris-generating incident. <br /> <br />Debris volume estimates are based on a series of assumptions and should not be considered as <br />the actual volumes following a disaster event. The debris volume estimate models use factors such <br />as household population and parcel data to forecast the volume and type of potential debris in each <br />disaster management area. <br /> <br />The following sections examine the three types of events with the highest risk rating for the Cit ies <br />and the potential debris generation from those events. They are earthquake, flood, and wildfire. The <br />assumptions used in each debris volume estimation model are provided below, along with the <br />estimated debris volumes and resource requirements. <br /> <br />Earthquake <br />Earthquakes result in structural damage to built-out infrastructure, including building stock and critical <br />infrastructure lifelines. Earthquakes may create secondary impacts, including mudslides, fires, and <br />hazardous materials incidents. <br /> <br />The Cities are in close proximity to a number of major earthquake faults, including the Calaveras, <br />Greenville, Hayward, Mount Diablo, and San Andreas faults. Since 1986, there have been thirteen <br />5.0M, or greater earthquakes near the Tri-Valley Area. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) <br />estimated in 2016 that there is a 72 percent probability of at least one 6.7M or greater earthquake <br />occurring in the San Francisco Bay Area before 2043 (USGS, 2016). <br /> <br />HAZUS modeling was used to estimate debris amounts for each City based on a scenario similar to <br />the 1868 Hayward Earthquake. Details of the scenario are listed below. Figure 1 provides a shake <br />map of similar event. <br /> Scenario Name:1868 Haywood 7M <br /> Earthquake Magnitude: 7.0M