My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10a
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
050322
>
10a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2022 8:19:13 AM
Creation date
4/28/2022 8:18:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/3/2022
EXPIRATION DATE
5/3/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Galvin questioned if Habitat was still having difficulty finding contractors and whether <br /> Habitat continued to offer volunteer opportunities. Ms. Gray indicated they had a good roster of <br /> contractors to do work throughout the three county areas they service, and they can keep them busy if <br /> they will not mind the government paperwork required to receive funds. She advised that volunteer <br /> opportunities may be available on other projects in areas like Oakland, Walnut Creek, and San Jose. <br /> Chairperson Galvin closed the meeting for agency presentations. <br /> Ms. Beckett from Centro Legal advised she was able to obtain information about the numbers served <br /> that Commissioner Fischer had requested. She stated that from January 1 through December 31, 2021 <br /> their teams in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties had provided 981 tenants with counsel and advice, <br /> and with extended services representation the number totaled 1,065. <br /> Chairperson Galvin questioned if attorney time was donated, and Ms. Beckett advised it was not and <br /> attorneys are paid through grants received. <br /> Chairperson Galvin questioned if commissioners had further questions before he asked for a motion. <br /> Mr. Hernandez informed commissioners that staff's funding recommendation could be found on pages <br /> three and four of the staff report. <br /> Commissioner Soby questioned why the Goodness Village funding request had received a significantly <br /> reduced funding recommendation from staff versus other requests. Mr. Hernandez stated that it was <br /> because the Goodness Village program was a pilot program with no record to show how successful it <br /> will be. He noted that the village has been open for less than a year, and if successful in the future, staff <br /> would recommend increased funding. <br /> Commissioner Soby asked Mr. Hernandez to explain how staff arrived at the $40,000 funding amount <br /> being recommended. Mr. Hernandez indicated that staff had taken into consideration the number of <br /> Pleasanton residents housed being approximately 20% of the entire population of twenty-eight <br /> residents and thought somewhere close to 30% of their request should be recommended. He noted <br /> that since putting the staff report together the number of Pleasanton residents at Goodness Village had <br /> increased from five to seven. <br /> Commissioner Soby confirmed with Mr. Hernandez that funding for this project would be coming from <br /> the Lower Income Housing Fund, and Mr. Hernandez noted that this program would not qualify for <br /> federal HOME funds so funds could not be taken from one of the other projects to increase funding for <br /> this one. Commissioner Soby indicated he was comfortable with the staff recommended funding <br /> amount but felt this was a good program needing to be given more consideration in the future because <br /> it is providing direct homes for the homeless. <br /> Commissioner Kripalani felt the commission had received reports from some fine organizations but was <br /> having difficulty judging the impact of programs based on the amount of money being spent and <br /> whether funding recommendations needed to be changed. He stated all are fine organizations, but he <br /> was struggling on what is a good strategy and what the strategic direction should be. Mr. Hernandez <br /> felt Pleasanton was fortunate to have the eight agencies providing distinct services all of which relate to <br /> affordable housing and have described the amount of time they spend with clients trying to prevent <br /> housing displacement or find housing for them. He noted that Pleasanton only partially funds the <br /> programs, and the agencies need to apply for grants from other jurisdictions, corporate sponsors, and <br /> individual donors to administer their programs for a 12-month period annually. <br /> Chairperson Galvin indicated he has had a chance to witness firsthand the work some of the agencies <br /> are providing, which sometimes includes writing a check to a landlord, and felt all of them were <br /> worthwhile of receiving funding. He further discussed the work of the commission and the <br /> recommendation they will be making to City Council, as well as the work of staff and staffs connection <br /> Housing Commission <br /> March 17,2022 <br /> Page 7 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.