PC-2021-18 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-2021-18 Page Nine Thus, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council find that the design of the subdivision will not have conflict with easements acquired for public use, and that it is appropriate to vacate the easement as requested. 8. The restriction on approving a tentative subdivision map on land covered by a land conservation contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act) is not applicable. The site is not covered by any land conservation contract, and so the Planning Commission recommend that the Council find that the Williamson Act is not applicable to this Project. 9. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision would not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Future homes will be connected to the City sanitary sewer system for conveyance to the sewer treatment plant. Stormwater runoff will be treated as part of the subdivision improvements. Thus, this subdivision will not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council find that the proposed subdivision will meet this requirement. Section 4: The Planning Commission hereby recommends the following to the City Council: a. Find that the Project would not have a significant effect on the environment; b. Find that the Project is consistent with the 1998 HVSP FEIR and the 1998 HVSP FEIR mitigation measures related to development of the Spotorno Flat Area as listed in the Initial Study/Consistency Checklist prepared for the Project shall apply; c. Find that the Project is consistent with the General Plan and HVSP; d. Find that the Project is consistent with the purposes of the PUD Ordinance, and make the PUD findings as listed in Section 2, above; e. Find that the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map application meets State law and the Zoning Ordinance of the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC) and make the required findings as listed in Section 3; f. Find that vacation of the easement is consistent with the General Plan; g. Approve Planned Unit Development PUD-138 and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 8616 subject to draft conditions of approval listed in Exhibit A. Section 5: This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. way became the City's upon annexation. Additionally, per the California Streets and Highways Code §8333, the city may summarily vacate a public service easement if the easement has not been used for the purpose for which it was dedicated or acquired for five consecutive years immediately preceding the proposed vacation. On November 3, 2021, the City notified utility agencies of the City's intent to vacant this decades old unused easement. No objections or comments have been received at the time this report was prepared. ect property is not located in a flood hazard zone. As such, the Commission recommends that the City Council conclude that this finding can be made. censed civil engineer, which include but is not limited to the type, location, and sizing calculations of the PUD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission Page 16 of 25 d) individuals. PUD-114-01M& P20-0995 Planning Commission Page 3 of 25