My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2021-10
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
PC-2021-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2022 11:04:34 AM
Creation date
4/25/2022 11:04:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/14/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
PC-2021-10
NOTES
P21-0076, PUD-141, TERRY TOWNSEND, MINOR SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), 2215 MARTIN AV
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. PC-2021-10 <br /> Page Three <br /> to the existing trees and vegetation on-site. The proposed site improvements <br /> relate well to the proposed residence as well as the existing residence on-site <br /> that is being retained on Parcel B. Outdoor space will be accommodated with <br /> each lot and they both will relate well to the site's natural and built features. <br /> The Planning Commission concludes this finding can be made. <br /> 4. Whether grading in conjunction with the proposed development plan <br /> takes into account environmental characteristics and is designed in <br /> keeping with the best engineering practices to avoid erosion, slides, or <br /> flooring, and to have as minimal an effect upon the environment as <br /> possible. <br /> The Planning Commission finds that grading is kept to a minimum and is only <br /> proposed for the new building pad and site improvements. The property is flat <br /> and would require no significant grading to accommodate the structures <br /> covered by this development plan. In addition, the flood hazard maps of the <br /> Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) indicate the subject <br /> property is not located in a flood hazard zone. The lots would drain to the <br /> face-of-curb and excess stormwater runoff would be directed into public street <br /> storm drains. Finally, dust suppression measures will be required as a <br /> Condition of Approval. As such, the Planning Commission concludes this <br /> finding can be made. <br /> 5. Whether streets, buildings, and other manmade structures have been <br /> designed and located in such a manner to complement the natural <br /> terrain and landscape. <br /> The subject lot is relatively flat and thus the proposed residence does not <br /> require extensive grading and does not contrast the natural terrain. The <br /> Planning Commission finds the proposal is sensitive to existing landscaping, <br /> maintaining most of the mature vegetation on-site. While a new second-story <br /> residence is proposed, given the proposed home's large setbacks, extensive <br /> landscaping, and articulated building design, the additional height is largely <br /> mitigated, and the scale is appropriate. The architectural style and detailing of <br /> the proposed residence are compatible with the existing residence and <br /> neighborhood. As such, the Planning Commission concludes this finding can <br /> be made. <br /> 6. Whether adequate public safety measures have been incorporated into <br /> the design or the proposed development plan. <br /> New homes are conditioned to be designed to meet the requirements of the <br /> California Building Code and applicable City codes. The Planning <br /> Commission finds the subject site has adequate access to serve police, fire, <br /> and other emergency vehicles. The new home will be equipped with <br /> automatic residential fire sprinklers. As such, the Planning Commission <br /> concludes this finding can be made. <br />ect lot is flat with mature existing <br /> vegetation. As such, the Planning Commission finds the residence is sensitive <br />ithin or beneath the <br /> dripline of the existing trees. <br /> Failure to comply with these requirements may result in a "stop work order". <br /> PUD-140&P21-0079 Planning Commission <br /> Page 14 of 15 <br /> will be <br /> refunded to the applicant. If the Acting City Surveyor's estimate is insufficient to cover <br /> their services, the applicant shall pay the difference between the initial estimate and the <br /> actual cost prior to submittal of the map for the Director of Engineering/City Engineer's <br /> signature. <br /> PUD-140 & P21-0079 Planning Commission <br /> Page 9 of 15 <br />