Laserfiche WebLink
Site Design <br /> Staff finds the site design is appropriate and complements the development pattern of Rose <br /> Avenue. The front unit is equal in height to the two-story apartments adjacent to the subject <br /> site (north) and there is minimal visibility of the new rear unit from the Rose Avenue. Due to the <br /> siting of the new units, the perceived massing is similar to what already exists in the <br /> neighborhood and existing landscaping on adjacent lots and new landscaping on the subject <br /> site would additionally soften and screen the new structures. As proposed, the project is <br /> consistent with the development standards of the subject zoning districts. <br /> The proposal includes site improvements such as a new paved driveway, walkways, and <br /> landscaping. The site design includes minor adjustments to the existing site plan to <br /> accommodate the units (i.e., removing three trees). Staff finds the minor adjustments to the <br /> site suitable to accommodate the units and a new tree and landscaping are proposed in areas <br /> where there is currently none. The site improvements and proposed private spaces relate well <br /> to the neighborhood and are sensitive to the site's natural features. <br /> Building Design and Massing <br /> The proposed buildings' design and architecture includes materials, detailing, and colors of high <br /> quality that are aesthetically pleasing, and are harmonious with and complement the existing <br /> home and the overall character of the neighborhood. <br /> The applicant has provided well-designed structures through various roof forms, the use of <br /> horizontal siding, and recessed window treatments on all building elevations which are <br /> appropriate for Downtown and provide sufficient visual interest. The proposed colors <br /> complement the existing home and neighborhood. As proposed, the new structures would <br /> measure approximately 23 feet and 9 inches and 22 feet and 5 inches in height (measured from <br /> grade to the'highest point of the structure) and would be compatible with the one- and two-story <br /> homes in the area. Overall, staff finds the architectural style of the buildings to be attractive and <br /> appropriate for Downtown. Additional details of the proposed architecture and materials can be <br /> further reviewed in the attached Project Plans, Exhibit B. <br /> The Downtown Design Guidelines recommend the use of traditional materials, finishes, colors, <br /> and detailing. Specific Downtown Design Guidelines that pertain to the proposed project <br /> include: <br /> • Duplex or triplex units behind single-family homes are to match the materials, <br /> elements, and architectural style of the front home; <br /> • Transition from multi-story, multi-family housing to adjacent single story single-family <br /> homes can be made with stepping down of building forms. Dormers, articulated <br /> chimneys and stairways, landscaping, architectural molding, and window bays that <br /> reduce the mass of the building wall can also be helpful; <br /> • Multiple Family housing complexes should be designed to follow the rhythm and scale <br /> of the surrounding homes; <br /> • Duplexes or triplexes located behind single-family homes are preferred over <br /> large-scale structures to maintain the small-town character of Downtown <br /> neighborhoods and to retain the single-family residential streetscape; <br /> P19-0410, 715 Rose Avenue Planning Commission <br /> 8of11 <br />y, especially for residential. She requested more data <br /> on the expenditure of funding and what percentage was directed at adding more housing versus <br /> the other programs, because HCD was looking at the number of built units. She stated it was <br /> worth exploring a housing overlay zone but the ordinance should align with State law for short <br /> term. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 7 February 9, 2022 <br />a business person would be equal with building a unit and paying an IZO. <br /> Ms. Clark explained the basis for the inclusionary zoning requirement, and the amount of the <br /> low-income housing fee were different and therefore, there was a disjuncture between the two <br /> fees (i.e. the in-lieu fee does not cover 100 % of the cost of constructing an affordable unit). <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 7 February 9, 2022 <br />