4 - Laserfiche WebLink

Two-unit bldg. Side (south) 5' min. 22' to building wall Garage w/unit 11' to building wall Rear (northeast) 10' min. Garage w/unit 10' to building wall Open Space Two-unit bldg. New units: 75 sq.ft. min. 126 sq.ft. (porch); 94 sq.ft. (balcony) Private Garage w/unit Existing house: 50 sq.ft. 104 sq. ft. (rear yard) min. Existing house Existing 138 sq. ft. porch Parking • Studio unit, 1 space • 1-bedroom units (2), Private 1.5 spaces each 6 spaces: 3 car garage and 3 uncovered • Existing house, 2 spaces spaces Total Required: 6 Spaces Guest Not required 1 uncovered space The proposal is consistent with its respective zoning districts, as shown in Table 1. As proposed, the setbacks are similar or greater than existing homes on Rose Avenue and in the neighborhood, which would be in keeping with the streetscape and not out of character for the area (see Figure 7). Figure 7: Streetscape I 11.7 r )moi ru67;14 Ing � f 755 741 715 see EE3 PROJECT LOCATION The PMC does not require guest parking for development projects in the Core Area Overly District, though the City encourages, and often requires, on-site guest parking for residential projects. The applicant is not seeking any variances from the PMC and has worked within the constraints of the property to meet the multi-family development standards for the new units and was able to provide an additional guest parking space. Off-street parking is also provided along both sides of Rose Avenue and condition of approval No. 7 in Exhibit A requires residents to always keep the garage clear and available for parking. The site layout has been designed to be functional, e.g. providing sufficient maneuvering space for vehicles, and accommodating sufficient room for landscaping; and sensitive to adjacent residential properties. P19-0410, 715 Rose Avenue Planning Commission 7 of 11 unit: 22'5" midpoint of the roof. Measured from finished grade to the top of the roof's ridge. Setbacks Two-unit bldg. Front (southwest) 15' min. 15' to first story porch; 21' to second story balcony Two-unit bldg. Side (north) 5' min. 5' to stairs; 8' to building wall Garage w/unit 5' to stairs; 8' to building wall P19-0410, 715 Rose Avenue Planning Commission 6 of 11 , which results in a P19-0410, 715 Rose Avenue Planning Commission 5 of 11 LEu I PROPOSED SITE PLAN 9`j+ P19-0410, 715 Rose Avenue Planning Commission 4 of 11 d in the report. 10.Future Planning Calendar Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 8 February 23, 2022 to be a leading innovator in providing affordable housing for the Pleasanton workforce. He suggested Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 8 February 23, 2022 icing was critical. She suggested reconsidering the basis for the low-income housing study, especially for residential. She requested more data on the expenditure of funding and what percentage was directed at adding more housing versus the other programs, because HCD was looking at the number of built units. She stated it was worth exploring a housing overlay zone but the ordinance should align with State law for short term. Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 7 February 9, 2022 a business person would be equal with building a unit and paying an IZO. Ms. Clark explained the basis for the inclusionary zoning requirement, and the amount of the low-income housing fee were different and therefore, there was a disjuncture between the two fees (i.e. the in-lieu fee does not cover 100 % of the cost of constructing an affordable unit). Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 7 February 9, 2022