|
Figure 4: Existing Site Layout
<br /> VOW n_ _ -.--
<br /> a AMAM
<br /> v
<br /> I m
<br /> �`
<br /> ni
<br /> v V.. Ir '1' +SING ONE =
<br /> w
<br /> — STORY PRIMARY ---~114. 15
<br /> E � V= STORY
<br /> z
<br /> a RESIDENCE L .
<br /> '
<br /> /^1
<br /> L9iB4 WE!�9[� YI
<br /> I
<br /> ) mI
<br /> EXISTING SITE PLAN '9'4'
<br /> PROJECT DESCRIPTION
<br /> The proposed project involves further developing the front and rear areas of the site, as shown
<br /> in Exhibit B in detail and described further in this report. The proposal includes constructing an
<br /> approximately 1,344-square-foot detached two-story, two-unit home in front of the existing
<br /> single-story home, demolishing the approximately 880-square-foot detached garage, and
<br /> constructing a detached, approximately 725-square-foot, three-car garage with an
<br /> approximately 660-square-foot unit above (totaling approximately 1,385 square feet in area)
<br /> behind the existing single-story home. The units in the two-unit building will be one-bedroom
<br /> and each have private open space (i.e., porch for the ground-level unit and balcony for the
<br /> second-floor unit). The proposed unit above the new garage is a studio unit and would have
<br /> private ground-floor open space at the rear of the structure. There are no proposed changes to
<br /> the existing home. Except for the new two-unit building at the front of the site and the proposed
<br /> parking stall north of the existing home, the proposed construction occurs largely in areas
<br /> which have already been disturbed, as shown in Exhibit B and Figure 5.
<br /> There are four uncovered parking spaces and a three-car garage. It's expected the front and
<br /> rear units would utilize the uncovered spaces and the existing home the garage, though on-site
<br /> parking will be managed/assigned by the property owner.
<br /> Figure 5: Proposed Site Layout
<br /> at4
<br /> ; :< l3J au ma - ; Y.•• 1___7,___________7::_____f_______________
<br /> le%
<br /> e 1' "
<br /> .,.... 0 ? 1\- ,4 ,r.
<br /> . , _, ---
<br /> (I/MOM .1..... W.tIxa�m 4(r mE
<br /> W \� -- s ONE . I
<br /> II �� STORY PRIMARY =j— Ie
<br /> W . "' RESIDENCE ,I,` -
<br /> � f J I
<br /> P.'
<br /> cn SIM
<br /> u4 a4 f /
<br /> immi
<br /> .___... ,,,,, ,. , , ,
<br /> .....
<br /> ...._:,,,, i ........
<br /> ___„. •,.. ....„,„..,,.... ..,.
<br /> - _.1 IX
<br /> nos mill OHM
<br /> IIT tf-• w 54 5014; \ • lie-I5
<br /> r a LEu I
<br /> PROPOSED SITE PLAN 9`j+
<br /> P19-0410, 715 Rose Avenue Planning Commission
<br /> 4 of 11
<br />d in the report.
<br /> 10.Future Planning Calendar
<br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 8 February 23, 2022
<br /> to be a
<br /> leading innovator in providing affordable housing for the Pleasanton workforce. He suggested
<br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 8 February 23, 2022
<br />icing was critical. She suggested reconsidering
<br /> the basis for the low-income housing study, especially for residential. She requested more data
<br /> on the expenditure of funding and what percentage was directed at adding more housing versus
<br /> the other programs, because HCD was looking at the number of built units. She stated it was
<br /> worth exploring a housing overlay zone but the ordinance should align with State law for short
<br /> term.
<br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 7 February 9, 2022
<br />a business person would be equal with building a unit and paying an IZO.
<br /> Ms. Clark explained the basis for the inclusionary zoning requirement, and the amount of the
<br /> low-income housing fee were different and therefore, there was a disjuncture between the two
<br /> fees (i.e. the in-lieu fee does not cover 100 % of the cost of constructing an affordable unit).
<br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 7 February 9, 2022
<br />
|