My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_Minutes_February 23, 2022
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2022
>
04-27
>
_Minutes_February 23, 2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2022 1:43:16 PM
Creation date
4/20/2022 1:43:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/27/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
THE CITY OF <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> _ LEASANTON._ MEETING MINUTES <br /> DRAFT <br /> Wednesday, February 23, 2022 <br /> This meeting was conducted via teleconference in accordance with Governor Newsom's Executive <br /> Order N-29-20, approved AB 361, and COVID-19 pandemic protocols. <br /> CALL TO ORDER, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, AND ROLL CALL <br /> The teleconference meeting of the Planning Commission of February 23, 2022 was called to <br /> order at 7:01 p.m. by Chair Pace. <br /> The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chair Pace. <br /> Staff Members Present: Shweta Bonn, Senior Planner; Ellen Clark, Director of Community <br /> Development; Melinda Denis, Planning and Permit Center Manager; <br /> Julie Harryman, Assistant City Attorney; Eric Luchini, Senior Planner; <br /> Matt Nelson, Associate Traffic Engineer; Sachiko Riddle, Recording <br /> Secretary; Mike Tassano; City Traffic Engineer <br /> Commissioners Present: Commissioners Nancy Allen, Justin Brown, Matt Gaidos, Ken <br /> Morgan, Jeff Nibert, and Chair Brandon Pace. <br /> Commissioners Absent: None <br /> AGENDA AMENDMENTS <br /> CONSENT CALENDAR - Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted by one <br /> motion unless a request for removal for discussion or explanation is received from the Planning <br /> Commission or a member of the public by submitting a speaker card for that item. <br /> 1. Actions of the Zoning Administrator <br /> 2. Approve the meeting minutes of January 12, 2022 <br /> 3. Approve the meeting minutes of January 26, 2022 <br /> 4. P21-1206, Robert Rossi/Sunshine Saloon, 1807 Santa Rita Rd - Application to modify an <br /> existing Conditional Use Permit (UP-91-77) to allow permanent outdoor dining, including <br /> outdoor consumption of alcohol, at an existing bar. Zoning is PUD-C (Planned Unit <br /> Development — Commercial) District. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 8 February 23, 2022 <br />nded (e.g., Committee, Task Force, etc.) <br /> There were no reports from meetings attended. <br /> 6. Actions of the City Council <br /> Ms. Clark provided a brief overview of the items listed in the report. <br /> 7. Future Planning Calendar <br /> Ms. Clark gave a brief overview of future items for the Commission's review. <br /> MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br /> Commissioner Allen requested an update on the value capture project approved by the Council. <br /> Ms. Clark stated progress had not yet been made but it remained on the list and staff was <br /> consulting with an expert. <br /> Chair Pace thanked Ms. Hagen for her hard work for the City. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 7 February 9, 2022 <br /> the percentage of affordable units required between <br /> multifamily and single-family to 20% and to clearly identify affordability levels. She stated she <br /> agreed with the first two recommendations on LIHF but would like to substantially raise the fees <br /> for non-residential very close to the maximum, because Pleasanton was an attractive place for <br /> businesses and the fees would not be a deterrent and the rate should provide the necessary <br /> units for the employees. She stated she would like to increase residential fees based on square <br /> footage or number of bedrooms and that tier pricing was critical. She suggested reconsidering <br /> the basis for the low-income housing study, especially for residential. She requested more data <br /> on the expenditure of funding and what percentage was directed at adding more housing versus <br /> the other programs, because HCD was looking at the number of built units. She stated it was <br /> worth exploring a housing overlay zone but the ordinance should align with State law for short <br /> term. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 7 February 9, 2022 <br />a business person would be equal with building a unit and paying an IZO. <br /> Ms. Clark explained the basis for the inclusionary zoning requirement, and the amount of the <br /> low-income housing fee were different and therefore, there was a disjuncture between the two <br /> fees (i.e. the in-lieu fee does not cover 100 % of the cost of constructing an affordable unit). <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 7 February 9, 2022 <br />