My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN 12212021
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2021
>
CCMIN 12212021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2022 1:42:00 PM
Creation date
4/20/2022 1:41:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/21/2021
EXPIRATION DATE
12/21/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
assessment of existing plans and policies, and an analysis of vulnerabilities to climate change impacts in the <br /> City. She reported 64% of the City's emissions come from transportation and 10% comes from energy use in <br /> buildings. She advised the next step was to forecast future emissions based on job and population growth <br /> which is adjusted to take into account other regulations that would impact the City's emission. The target <br /> date for carbon neutrality per capita is 2045. <br /> She reported a draft CAP and accompanying CEQA documentation has been completed and advised the <br /> next step will be preparing a final CAP that will respond to any of the comments received through the public <br /> review period. Staff will prepare a monitoring and evaluation tool to track progress annually and provide <br /> updates to the City Council. <br /> The Committee on Energy and the Environment recommended a set of actions to include in the final CAP <br /> with City Council comments incorporated into the draft document. The City Council recommended 16 <br /> primary actions and 9 secondary actions which are also reflected in the draft document. She explained <br /> major changes from the committee's recommendation include modifying Action P4 to require instead of <br /> encouraging covered projects to install solar and battery backup storage, move Action P15 from the <br /> secondary action list to the primary action list which expands incentives to install water efficiency retrofits, <br /> remove grass lawns and install native drought-tolerant landscaping, and to omit Action 1216 which was to <br /> create a dedicated staffing position to support the CAP implementation. <br /> Ms. Campbell reported the actions and strategies included in the draft document are across 6 sectors which <br /> are Buildings and Energy, Transportation and Land Use, Materials and Consumption, Natural Systems, <br /> Water and Wastewater, and Community Resilience and Well-being. The 16 primary actions are <br /> recommended to be implemented and phased over the next 10 years and the 9 secondary actions are <br /> recommended to be implemented as opportunities arise. <br /> The accompanying CEQA documentation includes a draft Initial Study Negative Declaration that evaluates <br /> CAP 2.0's potential impacts on 20 environment factors. The study determined that CAP 2.0 would not have <br /> a significant negative effect on the environment. She reported staff prepared a qualified GHG Reduction <br /> Plan and noted a qualified CAP would allow future development projects to streamline their GHG analysis <br /> under CEQA based on the City's adopted CAP. She explained to do that, projects would need to comply <br /> with the City's CAP so project compliance would be crucial for City to achieve its goals and targets. <br /> Next steps include the public review period which ends today, implementation of modifications as necessary, <br /> the preparation of a monitoring and evaluation tool, and summary CAP. She reported the Final CAP 2.0 will <br /> be reviewed by the committee in late January and considered for adoption by the City Council in February. <br /> Mayor Brown explained staff is looking for a City Council review and a draft of the Initial Study and Negative <br /> Declaration, initial feedback on the draft documents, and any suggested revisions to be incorporated into the <br /> CAP. She advised it will be brought back one more time in early 2022. <br /> Mayor Brown opened the public hearing. <br /> Becky Dennis recommended the definition of urban forest be expanded to take into account the native <br /> vegetation in the City. She submitted ideas to staff on how to generate mulch. There are also no programs <br /> linking transportation improvements to land use. She noted the biggest problem in Pleasanton with <br /> emissions is the city is not able to get its workforce into Pleasanton to live. She encouraged developing an <br /> employer-assisted housing program to the CAP to help support carbon neutrality and to consider having <br /> stringent emission requirements for all new development. <br /> Jocelyn Combs expressed delight that the revised plan states the City will implement every single element. <br /> She recommends the project have a full-time Project Manager and advised she worked in that role in the <br /> past and knows how involved it can be. She believes the City would be well-served to have a single point <br /> person on this. She encouraged the City to aggressively look for grants to achieve the CAP 2.0 goals. <br /> Mayor Brown closed the public hearing. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 8 of 18 December 21, 2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.