Laserfiche WebLink
H <br /> Analyze.Advise.Act. <br /> 700 South Flower Street,Suite 2995, Los Angeles,CA 90017 <br /> T: 310-581-0900 F: 310-581-0910 I www.hraadvisors.com <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> To: Oscar Orci, City of Long Beach <br /> From: HR&A Advisors, Inc. <br /> Date: February 4, 2021 <br /> Re: Analysis of a Proposed Moderate-Income Housing Transaction for the Oceanaire Property <br /> Introduction <br /> Purpose of the Analysis <br /> HR&A Advisors,Inc.("HR&A")was engaged by the City of Long Beach(the"City" or"Long Beach") to conduct <br /> detailed and independent programmatic and financial review of a proposed project to convert an existing <br /> 216-unit Class A multifamily building called the Oceanaire and located at 150 West Ocean Boulevard in <br /> the City, to moderate-income housing using a tax-exempt bond financing structure, which also qualifies the <br /> Oceanaire for ad valorem property tax abatement during the term of the financing (the"Transaction").The <br /> Transaction proponents,California Statewide Communities Development Authority's Community Improvement <br /> Authority ("CSCDA") and Waterford Properties ("Waterford") brought the proposal to the City in October <br /> 2020. At a meeting on November 17, 2020, the City Council directed Long Beach Development Services <br /> staff to provide a detailed review and recommended action for City Council consideration. HR&A's analysis <br /> supports the City staff analysis by reviewing the terms of the Transaction, potential benefits and risks, and <br /> provides recommendations if the City Council is inclined to proceed with the Transaction. <br /> HR&A's analysis included several approaches to fully understand the scope and implications of the <br /> Transaction. HR&A first conducted a detailed review of draft Transaction documents provided by CSCDA to <br /> City staff and available related documentation a similar transaction that recently closed its financing in <br /> Anaheim. HR&A also met with Transaction proponents several times to better understand their assumptions, <br /> expectations, and projections within the Transaction underwriting process. In addition, HR&A conducted <br /> independent research using third party sources, including CoStar real estate data, HUD databases, <br /> interviews with California Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD"), and city staff <br /> reports related to other similar proposals in Anaheim, Carson and San José. Finally, HR&A also drew on its <br /> 40 years of experience advising cities and other public agencies across the U.S. on affordable housing <br /> programs and finance, and other consulting experience for the City. <br /> HR&A completed an initial evaluation of the proposed Transaction in a memorandum dated January 13, <br /> 2021, which City staff shared with the Transaction proponents. On January 19,the Transaction proponents <br /> provided comments on HR&A's initial analysis along with a new market study and an updated financial <br /> model, which they further updated on January 21. They also agreed to make several changes to the <br /> Transaction including an increase to the percentage of units at the lower end of the moderate-income <br /> affordability range; increasing the financial commitment to property maintenance capital expenditures; a <br /> faster pace to conversion of all units to moderate-income; reducing some Transaction fees; making payment <br /> of the City's annual monitoring fee; and reimbursing City costs to review the proposed Transaction.This memo <br /> considers the new information provided to HR&A and the revised and new Transaction commitments. <br /> The analysis in this memo provides perspective on several critical topics focusing on the City's potential <br /> benefits from the Transaction and,the recent improvements notwithstanding, how the deal structure could be <br /> adjusted to better protect the City's interests.These topics include further enhancing the affordability benefits <br /> of the Transaction; market conditions that could reduce the City's affordability and fiscal benefit; and the <br /> financial benefits to the Transaction proponents. <br /> New York I Dallas I Los Angeles I Raleigh I Washington DC <br />