My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
24
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
041922
>
24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2022 1:41:47 PM
Creation date
4/13/2022 1:41:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/19/2022
EXPIRATION DATE
4/19/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br /> April 16,2021 <br /> Subject:JPA-issued Bonds for Moderate-Income Housing <br /> Page 9 <br /> not subject to pay this tax. During a sample 30-year period, a large residential property may change <br /> ownership several times. The resulting forgone transfer tax revenue would reduce the Measure E <br /> funds available for deeply affordable deed-restricted affordable housing, housing preservation, and <br /> homelessness strategies. <br /> Potential partial mitigants—The impacts of foregone property and transfer taxes can be <br /> mitigated by the City's hiring a consultant to carefully review each transaction for City <br /> Council consideration and requiring the City Council approve each transaction. It can also <br /> be limited by capping the number of transactions approved under this structure, and by <br /> ensuring that an amount equal to foregone revenues is repaid in higher priority at the time of <br /> property disposition if the City declines to purchase a property and it is sold at the end of <br /> the 30-year period. This could take the form of a Payment In Lieu of Taxes obligation. <br /> The amount offoregone tax revenues can be limited through analysis,terms and conditions, <br /> and caps on the number of buildings able to be purchased through this product. <br /> High purchase offers may alter the San José real estate market—Staff is concerned about the <br /> price impact that these transactions could have on the overall market within San José. Staff has <br /> heard from those in the investment community that the JPAs are already pursuing deals in San José <br /> with prices offered that may exceed typical market-rate offers and could crowd out other private <br /> investment. Overpayment for properties, made possible by the property tax exemption and JPA tax- <br /> exempt bond issuance, also would increase the amount of debt on each property/transaction, <br /> thereby limiting the City's ability to exercise its purchase option in years 15 to 30. <br /> Mitigants: In order to mitigate this risk of high purchase offers impacting the market, the <br /> term sheet requires a third-party appraisal to validate purchase prices. Requiring a third- <br /> party appraisal may slow a transaction down slightly,but appraisals are a prudent real estate <br /> practice that should not be foregone to size a reasonable amount of debt on the property. <br /> The terms also include a requirement for studies assessing the physical needs of each <br /> property to properly size capital replacement reserves needed over time, which also right <br /> sizes the amount of debt that can be serviced annually. <br /> The risk that public tax subsidy unintentionally alters the local real estate market can be <br /> mitigated, but not eliminated, by requiring prudent underwriting practices. <br /> Finally, in addition to these five issues, staff continues to be concerned about the potential focus by <br /> the State and/or the IRS on this new type of conduit financing.10 The risk that the City as a JPA <br /> member could be pulled into audits or have to spend time addressing reputational attacks appears <br /> real, particularly given early reports about the transactions conveying limited public benefits <br /> relative to fees. <br /> 10 A fuller discussion of this issue is found in staff's December 2,2020,memorandum to the Rules Committee,heard <br /> by the City Council on December 15,2020. <br /> https://sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&1 D=8954795&GUID=DBE8A2A 7-3985-4E78-B EF2-9BEBA5E2D800 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.