Laserfiche WebLink
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br /> April 16,2021 <br /> Subject:JPA-issued Bonds for Moderate-Income Housing <br /> Page 5 <br /> HR&A Noted Many Concerns in its Analysis of a CSCDA Long Beach Transaction <br /> For the Oceanaire transaction in Long Beach, the City of Long Beach hired HR&A Advisors8 to <br /> analyze the transaction and the proposed financing product. HR&A is a well-respected real estate <br /> and economic development consulting firm that San José currently has under contract for analysis <br /> of the Diridon Station development. (HR&A's February 4, 2021, memo for the City of Long Beach <br /> is included as Attachment A.) <br /> Note that the HR&A memo is highly cautionary, focusing on HR&A's concerns about the structure <br /> that remained even though the following terms were negotiated and changed in the favor of the City <br /> of Long Beach: <br /> • Deepened affordability for moderate-income apartments <br /> • Sped up conversion of units from market-rate to moderate-income <br /> • Provided an updated market study <br /> • Increased capital maintenance reserves <br /> • Reduced some transaction fees <br /> • Paid the City an annual monitoring fee <br /> • Reimbursed the City's costs for review of the transaction. <br /> Staff concurs with HR&A's assessment that there are several key areas of concern that must be <br /> weighed carefully when considering this new financing model. These areas are discussed further <br /> below. Proponents of the JPA structure argue that there is no risk to the City, little staff work <br /> needed by the City, and no subsidization required by the City. While it is true that the City is not <br /> directly liable for the debt, it would join a JPA that would issue non-rated bonds subject to Federal <br /> securities laws and antifraud provisions and would be associated with any bonds that fail or <br /> encounter difficulties. The developer and the JPA also are not liable for repayment of the bonds and <br /> the developers provide no equity or capital, despite collecting fees that would seem to suggest <br /> otherwise. Moreover, while the projects no longer contribute property taxes,the City would <br /> continue to serve them and if the project deteriorated or failed,the residents are City residents. As <br /> a result, there are still certain implied responsibilities that the City assumes for these transactions. <br /> Additionally, while the City does not award a cash subsidy to help acquire the properties,the <br /> ongoing property tax exemption is a significant voluntary tax subsidy by the City, and a significant <br /> involuntary contribution by the County, local school districts and other overlapping tax entities, <br /> including the State of California through its funding formula backfilling property tax for school <br /> districts. <br /> The following five concerns highlighted per HR&A's analysis and staff's other recent research <br /> continue to stand out as material in staff's recommendations. Of the five, one is a structural issue <br /> with no apparent mitigations,three can be only partially mitigated, and one can likely be mitigated. <br /> A high-level summary of these issues is as follows: <br /> 8 https://www.hraadvisors.com/ <br />