Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 2.A. <br /> COUNCIL AGENDA: 04/27/21 <br /> FILE: 21-885 <br /> el)14 ITEM: 3.7 <br /> CITY OF <br /> SANJOSE Memorandum <br /> CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY <br /> TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND FROM: Jacky Morales-Ferrand <br /> CITY COUNCIL Julia H. Cooper <br /> Nanci Klein <br /> SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: April 16, 2021 <br /> Approved Date <br /> 4/16/2021 <br /> SUBJECT: PUBLIC PURPOSE BONDS ISSUED BY A JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY <br /> FOR MODERATE-INCOME RENTAL HOUSING <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> Accept the staff report on public purpose bonds issued by a joint powers authority(JPA) for <br /> moderate-income housing, and direct the Administration not to move forward with releasing a term <br /> sheet in order to pursue membership in one or more JPAs for moderate-income housing at this <br /> time. <br /> OUTCOME <br /> With the approval of the staff recommendation,the City would not issue a Request for Proposals <br /> and would not join any JPAs that use the new financing model for moderate-income housing. <br /> However, Housing Department staff would continue to pursue other opportunities and strategies for <br /> both affordable and moderate-income housing that make more efficient use of City funds and <br /> resources. <br /> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> Staff has conducted additional analysis of this new financing strategy for moderate-income <br /> housing. Larger cities in California, such as Oakland and San Francisco, have chosen not to join <br /> any of the JPAs. Further analysis by staff raised significant concerns, and while staff is eager to <br /> advance housing affordability, staff believes that the risks and costs of joining such JPAs outweigh <br /> the potential benefits. Especially given the low likelihood of success in having JPAs agree to all of <br /> the City's terms, the City Council's recent de-prioritization of the Moderate-Income Housing <br /> Strategy,the considerable staff time involved, and most importantly, the use of public subsidy and <br /> debt to produce little improvement in affordability but large fees, the Administration recommends <br /> against issuing an RFP and proceeding with this work. Staff has provided two alternatives. One <br />