My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
24
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
041922
>
24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2022 1:41:47 PM
Creation date
4/13/2022 1:41:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/19/2022
EXPIRATION DATE
4/19/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
opportunity. Since then, the Mayor has also requested a discussion of the CSCDA <br /> program be agendized, and it is therefore before the City Council for consideration. <br /> Additional information provided by CSCDA, with respect to the Workforce Housing <br /> Program is included as Attachment 1 . <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Overview of the Workforce Housing Program <br /> As noted, the CSCDA Workforce Housing Program is effectively a public-private <br /> partnership that leverages the benefits of tax-exempt public purpose bonds issued by <br /> CSCDA to acquire market-rate rental apartment buildings and then convert them to deed- <br /> restricted units, typically targeted at rent levels between 80 percent and 120 percent AMI. <br /> Although it is possible to deed-restrict rents at lower income levels, to be financially <br /> feasible units below 80 percent AMI can typically constitute only a relatively small <br /> proportion of the total units in a project; and/or more units at the upper end of the <br /> moderate-income range may be required to balance the lower rent receipts and avoid <br /> needing any additional public subsidy.' As noted above, affordability splits can vary among <br /> projects (typically some proportion of units at 80 percent, 100 percent and 120 percent <br /> AMI), but this can be negotiated to some degree through a project-specific agreement. As <br /> further noted, annual rent increases are capped at 4 percent, irrespective of increases to <br /> the AMI or other factors over time. <br /> In addition to the cost of purchasing the property, additional costs and fees accrue to the <br /> project to fund various parties involved in the transaction and/or long-term management of <br /> the property. As a result, a typical transaction will involve issuance of multiple bonds — in <br /> recent transactions reported by CSCDA-CIA this has included Series A and B bonds for <br /> the property purchase, and Series C bonds that pay a manager and other parties for <br /> transaction fees and other ongoing costs incurred to maintain and manage the property. <br /> Parties involved in a transaction, in addition to CSCDA and the City, would include a <br /> project sponsor2, a property manager who is paid to manage and maintain the property <br /> over time, and a financing team (including underwriters, financial advisors, and bond <br /> counsel). It can sometimes be the case that the seller of a property acquired through the <br /> program is then retained to offer management services, meaning that they benefit from <br /> both sides of the transaction. <br /> As part of the arrangement, CSCDA acquires the property and records a regulatory <br /> agreement (to which the City is a party) specifying the affordability terms, allowable annual <br /> rent increases, and other aspects of the program. The repayment obligation for the bonds <br /> (typically a 30-year term) is payable solely from the revenues (i.e., rents) derived from the <br /> project. Thus, the amount available to pay annual debt service of the bond, including any <br /> new debt that might accrue to the project, would be dependent on the overall cash flow of <br /> ' For example, the City's existing Inclusionary Housing Program requires 15% of units in new apartment <br /> buildings to be rented to persons at 50% AMI very-low income or 51-80% of AMI low-income. <br /> Major participants in this market include companies such as Windstar, Catalyst Housing, and Opportunity <br /> Housing Group. <br /> Page 3 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.