My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
041222 SPECIAL
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2022 1:34:19 PM
Creation date
4/6/2022 1:31:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/12/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.14 Developing the Final Conceptual <br />Plan and Cost Estimate <br />FINAL CONCEPTUAL PLAN <br />There was an abundant amount of feedback <br />received from Parks and Recreation Commission <br />#2, Human Services Commission, Youth <br />Commission, the Farmer's Market event, Public <br />Workshop #2, the Community -Wide Survey #2, <br />and City Council Meeting #I. Each of these groups <br />had valuable input on the design alternatives, and <br />throughout the outreach process much of the <br />preference for the alternatives was split with a lean <br />toward Concept #I. In general, children tended <br />to lean towards Concept #I, while adults had a <br />slight preference for Concept #2. In the end, City <br />Council members reviewed the concepts and public <br />feedback and their preferred choice was Concept <br />#I: Pleasanton's Rise Playground. <br />Utilizing the feedback received from the outreach, <br />the design team and City staff came up with a list <br />of modifications to the design of Concept #I. Some <br />of these modifications included elements that were <br />popular in Concept #2 and are as follows: <br />• Add 1 additional ADA parking space (6 total). The <br />concept alternatives both included 5 ADA parking <br />spaces. Concerns about limited parking was a <br />common theme among feedback received. <br />• Rethink the Bird. The central bird structure was <br />determined to not fit the design theme, and <br />other options should be considered. Staff and the <br />design team agreed to explore a butterfly -themed <br />structure, as requested by some members of the <br />public and city council. <br />38 PLEASANTON ALL -ABILITIES PLAYGROUND <br />• Replace the Teen Climber with the Challenge <br />Course. The challenge course of Concept #2 was <br />a popular element that garnered more positive <br />feedback than the large teen climber. <br />• Include the Stage and Artistic Shelters from <br />Concept #2. Both the stage area and the shadow - <br />play shade shelters were popular features of <br />Concept #2. <br />• Relocate Fitness Equipment along Path. The <br />fitness equipment along the walking loop was a <br />popular element of Concept #2. <br />• Small Spatial Changes. It was requested that <br />small edits be made to the maintenance path and <br />the size of the bankshot basketball area. <br />In addition to these modifications, the design team <br />made small changes to the central play area to <br />better fit the existing grading of the site. The Sun <br />Plaza and entry space were reconfigured to provide <br />an enhanced and more straightforward entry <br />experience. <br />COST ESTIMATE <br />A Conceptual Level Cost Estimate was created <br />to obtain budgetary numbers for the construction <br />of the playground. Conceptual estimates are <br />preliminary in nature due to the large amount of <br />unknowns in the design, such as accurate grading, <br />stormwater and utility information, custom <br />equipment and footing design, etc. Because of this, <br />a 25% design contingency has been added to the <br />estimate. The conceptual level cost estimated for <br />the construction of this 2.5 acre playground is <br />approximately $7.5 million dollars. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.