Laserfiche WebLink
ORDINANCE NO. 2236 <br /> AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON ADOPTING <br /> DISTRICT ELECTIONS FOR CITY COUNCILMEMBERS, ESTABLISHING DISTRICT <br /> BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 2.04 <br /> OF TITLE 2 OF THE PLEASANTON MUNICIPAL CODE <br /> WHEREAS, the City of Pleasanton currently elects its Councilmembers using an at-large <br /> election system. In an at-large election system, candidates may live in any part of the City and <br /> each Councilmember is elected by voters of the entire City; <br /> WHEREAS, on August 5, 2021, the City received a letter from attorney Kevin Shenkman <br /> on behalf of Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, asserting the City's at-large <br /> councilmember election system violates the California Voting Rights Act ("CVRA") and <br /> threatening litigation if the City does not voluntarily change to a district-based election system for <br /> electing Councilmembers. <br /> WHEREAS, in a district-based election system, a candidate for City Council must live in <br /> the district which he or she wishes to represent, and only the voters of that district are entitled to <br /> vote to decide who their representative will be; <br /> WHEREAS, the City denies that its at-large councilmember electoral system violates the <br /> CVRA or any other provision of law and asserts the City's election system is legal in all respects <br /> and further denies any wrongdoing in connection with the manner in which it has conducted its <br /> City Council elections. Despite the foregoing, the City Council determined that the purposes of <br /> the CVRA and the public interest would be best served by transitioning to a district-based election <br /> system and avoiding the risks and costs of defending against a CVRA lawsuit; <br /> WHEREAS, under the provisions of California Elections Code Section 10010, a city that <br /> changes from an at-large city council method of election to a district-based city council method of <br /> election must hold a total of four public hearings, which includes at least two public hearings <br /> regarding potential voting district boundaries prior to the release and consideration of any draft <br /> voting district maps, and at least two public hearings following the release of draft voting district <br /> maps. <br /> WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on September 21, 2021, the City <br /> Council adopted a resolution that initiated the process of establishing a district-based election <br /> system and adopting the public hearing schedule; <br /> WHEREAS, upon the adoption of that resolution, Mr. Shenkman, on behalf of his clients, <br /> agreed to an extension of time by which the City could convert to districts, to and including March <br /> 17, 2022; <br /> WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code Section 10010, on January 4, 2022 and January <br /> 18, 2022, the City Council held public hearings to consider input from the public on the <br /> composition of the Council districts and criteria for determining district boundaries. The City <br /> Council considered all oral and written information, testimony, and comments received during the <br /> public review process. On January 18, 2022, the City Council directed its demographer to develop <br /> at least three map options; <br />