Laserfiche WebLink
ORDINANCE NO. 2236 <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON ADOPTING <br />DISTRICT ELECTIONS FOR CITY COUNCILMEMBERS, ESTABLISHING DISTRICT <br />BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 2.04 <br />OF TITLE 2 OF THE PLEASANTON MUNICIPAL CODE <br />WHEREAS, the City of Pleasanton currently elects its Councilmembers using an at -large <br />election system. In an at -large election system, candidates may live in any part of the City and <br />each Councilmember is elected by voters of the entire City; <br />WHEREAS, on August 5, 2021, the City received a letter from attorney Kevin Shenkman <br />on behalf of Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, asserting the City's at -large <br />councilmember election system violates the California Voting Rights Act ("CVRA") and <br />threatening litigation if the City does not voluntarily change to a district -based election system <br />for electing Councilmembers. <br />WHEREAS, in a district -based election system, a candidate for City Council must live in <br />the district which he or she wishes to represent, and only the voters of that district are entitled to <br />vote to decide who their representative will be; <br />WHEREAS, the City denies that its at -large councilmember electoral system violates the <br />CVRA or any other provision of law and asserts the City's election system is legal in all respects <br />and further denies any wrongdoing in connection with the manner in which it has conducted its <br />City Council elections. Despite the foregoing, the City Council determined that the purposes of <br />the CVRA and the public interest would be best served by transitioning to a district -based <br />election system and avoiding the risks and costs of defending against a CVRA lawsuit; <br />WHEREAS, under the provisions of California Elections Code Section 10010, a city that <br />changes from an at -large city council method of election to a district -based city council method <br />of election must hold a total of four public hearings, which includes at least two public hearings <br />regarding potential voting district boundaries prior to the release and consideration of any draft <br />voting district maps, and at least two public hearings following the release of draft voting district <br />maps. <br />WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on September 21, 2021, the <br />City Council adopted a resolution that initiated the process of establishing a district -based <br />election system and adopting the public hearing schedule; <br />WHEREAS, upon the adoption of that resolution, Mr. Shenkman, on behalf of his clients, <br />agreed to an extension of time by which the City could convert to districts, to and including <br />March 17, 2022; <br />WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code Section 10010, on January 4, 2022 and January <br />18, 2022, the City Council held public hearings to consider input from the public on the <br />composition of the Council districts and criteria for determining district boundaries. The City <br />Council considered all oral and written information, testimony, and comments received during <br />the public review process. On January 18, 2022, the City Council directed its demographer to <br />develop at least three map options; <br />