My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
21
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
031522
>
21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2022 12:24:12 PM
Creation date
3/14/2022 12:16:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Incentives reduce financial impact of requirements. <br />IH programs offer a variety of incentives to both voluntary <br />and mandatory programs to encourage the production of <br />affordable units, to offset the cost of providing affordable <br />housing units, and to minimize potential lawsuits in <br />the case of mandatory programs. Density bonuses are <br />offered most frequently, with 382 out of 671 programs <br />(57%) providing this incentive (Figure 6). In addition, <br />24% of programs offer other zoning variances, such as a <br />reduction in site development standards, modification <br />of architectural design requirements, and reduction in <br />parking requirements. A less commonly used incentive <br />includes waivers or the reduction of administrative <br />fees. Other incentives include expedited processing, <br />400 57% <br />350 W <br />concessions on the size and cost of finishes of affordable <br />units, tax relief abatement, and direct public subsidy. <br />Notably, 29% of programs do not offer any incentives, <br />whereas 35% of programs— including some mandatory <br />programs — offer more than one type of incentive. <br />Programs in California generally offer incentives other <br />than a density bonus. In Massachusetts, nearly half of <br />programs, 48%, do not offer any incentives, but for those <br />that do, density bonuses and other zoning variances are <br />the most common (48% and 20%, respectively). In New <br />Jersey, two in three programs, or about 68%, do not offer <br />any incentives, and only about one in four programs, <br />27%, offer a density bonus. Other types of incentives are <br />almost never offered in New Jersey. <br />N <br />l: 300 <br />m <br />i <br />250 <br />CL 29°x6 <br />w 200 <br />y240 <br />150 <br />E 17% <br />Z 100 13% 11% <br />50 6% <br />4% 3% <br />0 — <br />ELM <br />Density Otherzoning Fee reduction/ Expedited Unit Tax relief/ Direct Other None <br />bonus variances waiver permitting concessions abatement subsidy/TIF <br />U.S., excluding 0 California Massachusetts New Jersey <br />CA, MA, & NJ <br />Figure 6. Program count and percentage by incentive (n = 673, or 98% of all) <br />Most programs have resale/rent restrictions: Almost <br />all IH programs have some form of legal agreement <br />in place to establish price/rent restrictions. These <br />restrictions help keep inclusionary units affordable to <br />targeted income -eligible groups. Legal agreements <br />0 <br />can be in the form of deed restrictions, deed covenants, <br />ground leases, development agreements, or affordable housing <br />agreements. Overall, 99x/0 of 603 rental programs and 98x/0 of <br />612 for -sale programs forwhich data is available have legal <br />agreements in place to preserve affordability long-term. This <br />pattern is consistent across states and regions. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.