My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
031522
>
20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2022 8:51:37 AM
Creation date
3/10/2022 8:51:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Design to accommodate classes, programs, and community events <br /> • Allow for all wheels (skateboards, scooters, bikes, etc.) <br /> • Provide a variety of design features such as half-pipes, hips, box jumps, spines, <br /> waves, rails, stair gaps, a mega-ramp, bowls, etc. <br /> • Include a feature unique to this park such as a pyramid <br /> • Maximize the size of the skatepark while still making sure the design fit the site. <br /> Youth Commission <br /> The Commission's input was as follows: <br /> • The majority of the Commission felt that the proposed additional parking was <br /> necessary and that the City should provide as much parking as feasible without <br /> negatively impacting the healthy trees on site <br /> • Consider adding a small restroom at the skatepark since the softball field <br /> restrooms are often closed and the next closest restroom (at the proposed all <br /> abilities playground) is more than 1/8 of a mile away from the skatepark <br /> • Suggested potentially combining the two beginner areas into one larger area to <br /> help minimize potential beginner/advanced skater conflicts at the drop-in area <br /> • Include lighting for the skatepark and pathways to improve safety in the park. <br /> Community Workshop #2 <br /> More than two dozen people showed up at the workshop and the City received positive <br /> feedback from neighbors and skaters alike. Input included: <br /> • Neighbors felt the proposed focused skatepark lighting was appropriate <br /> • Overall support for expanding the skatepark <br /> • Mixed reviews on keeping or replacing the existing skatepark <br /> • Received dozens of specific comments regarding skatepark design features, <br /> including design bank to bank gaps, kidney bean, manual pads, etc. <br /> • Provide bathroom access, especially for skate camps <br /> • Provide shade <br /> • Provide areas where people can hang out and skaters can leave their stuff <br /> • Prefer concept 2 <br /> • Include something for everybody — beginners and experts alike. <br /> City Council <br /> • Overall support for the design and project <br /> • Include at least 20 additional parking stalls if not more <br /> • Include skatepark lighting, but work to limit impact to surrounding neighbors <br /> • Provide drinking fountains <br /> • Expressed concerns about the current lack of construction funds and asked <br /> about potentially phasing the project, particularly the bathroom <br /> • Include shaded areas and retain trees as feasible <br /> • Work with skaters on skatepark design-specific features <br /> • Prefer concept 2. <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.