My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 221271
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2020-present
>
2022
>
RES 221271
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2022 2:56:45 PM
Creation date
3/1/2022 2:32:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GHG Reduction Strategies Quantification and Evidence Page 20 Cost Cost assumptions and outcomes for the buildings & energy sector are summarized below: Action Information Outputs City Inputs Community References ID Action NPV Costs to City NPV Costs to Community City Cost Source(s) City Cost Assumptions/Comments Community Cost Source(s) Community Cost Assumptions/Comments P1 All‐electric reach code $49,020 ($2,784,572) CA Energy Codes & Standards Cost‐Effectiveness Explorer 2019 Pleasanton studies; Dublin CAP ‐ Appx C p. 8 Staff time required for cost effectiveness evaluation plus community outreach, reach code development, drafting an ordinance for City Council consideration, and initial implementation of the new ordinance. Reach code takes two years to get into place. CA Energy Codes & Standards Cost‐Effectiveness Explorer 2019 Pleasanton studies; Dublin CAP ‐ Appx C p. 7; Electrification Cost Effectiveness Memo_Update_Final All‐electric buildings are generally cheaper to build and cheaper to operate over time when compared to traditional buildings with both gas and electricity ‐ Assume $95/yr in net utility savings per single‐family household, $21/yr for multi‐family homes, $24,300/yr for businesses (blend of retail and office buildings). Assumes new construction reflected by anticipated increases in households and businesses. P2 Existing Building Electrification Plan $138,455 $137,032 ACEEE Electrifying Commercial Buildings 2020 p. v; Dublin CAP ‐ Appx C p. 13 One‐time costs are to develop the plan and electrify municipal buildings. FTE is for ongoing implementation. E3 report p. xi, 66 & 81; ACEEE Electrifying Commercial Buildings 2020 p. v; Dublin CAP ‐ Appx C p. 13 According to E3, 84% of single‐family households and 8% of multifamily households would achieve net lifecycle cost savings by completing a retrofit of the HVAC and hot water heater. An additional 16% of single‐family homes and 39% of multifamily homes would see lifecycle costs of less than $100 a year. (The remaining 53% of multifamily households could see up to $200/yr added costs.) ACEEE's 2020 study found that 27% of commercial floor space heated with fossil fuel systems can be electrified today with a simple payback of less than 10 years and without any rebates or carbon pricing. To achieve a 10% overall reduction in natural gas use by 2030, retrofits on 20% of multi‐family homes (8% with net savings, 12% with $100/yr lifecycle costs) are assumed to begin mid‐way into the implementation period to allow for program ramp‐up.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.