Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton <br />Pleasanton Climate Action Plan 2.0 <br /> <br />40 <br />5 Cultural Resources <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />with <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact <br />Would the project: <br />a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the <br />significance of a historical resource <br />pursuant to §15064.5? □ □ ■ □ <br />b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the <br />significance of an archaeological resource <br />pursuant to §15064.5? □ □ ■ □ <br />c. Disturb any human remains, including <br />those interred outside of formal <br />cemeteries? □ □ ■ □ <br />a. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource <br />pursuant to §15064.5? <br />The Pleasanton General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element identifies 86 historic-aged <br />properties and five historic neighborhoods potentially eligible for listing as historic resources.44 The <br />CAP 2.0 would not involve land use or zoning changes but would promote infrastructure <br />development and redevelopment that would be complimentary to existing development. CAP 2.0 <br />projects would be required to comply with Pleasanton General Plan Conservation and Open Space <br />goals, policies, and programs related to the preservation of historic resources, including Programs <br />5.1 and 5.2. These programs require the identification and protection of sites and structures within <br />the City of architectural, historical, archaeological, and cultural significance and the inclusion of <br />cultural resources studies, construction monitoring, and/or mitigation as appropriate for future <br />development projects. This includes sites, structures, and areas that are associated with a historic <br />event, activity, or persons that contribute to the historic character of districts, neighborhoods, <br />landmarks, historic structures, and artifacts. CAP 2.0 projects and actions would be reviewed for <br />compliance with applicable local, regional, and State regulations regarding cultural resources and <br />the Pleasanton General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element to avoid adverse impacts <br />related to historic resources. Therefore, the CAP 2.0 would result in a less-than-significant impact <br />related to historical resources. <br />b. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological <br />resource pursuant to §15064.5? <br />The Pleasanton General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element acknowledges that scattered <br />known archeological sites are primarily concentrated along arroyos and marsh areas and that there <br />are likely to be additional areas of buried archaeological resources that have not been previously <br /> <br />44 Pleasanton, City of. 2009. Pleasanton General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element. Available: <br /><https://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=23910>. Accessed October 7, 2021