My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
030122
>
15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2022 1:57:38 PM
Creation date
2/25/2022 1:49:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/1/2022
EXPIRATION DATE
3/1/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment <br /> ORDINANCE <br /> AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY° COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br /> PLEASANTON ADOPTING DISTRICT ELECTIONS FOR CITY <br /> COUNCILMEMBERS, ESTABLISHING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES OF <br /> THE CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 2.04 OF <br /> TITLE 2 OF THE PLEASANTON MUNICIPAL CODE <br /> WHEREAS, the City of Pleasanton currently elects its Councilmembers using an <br /> at-large election system. In an at-large election system, candidates may live in any part <br /> of the City and each Councilmember is elected by voters of the entire City; <br /> WHEREAS, on August 5, 2021 , the City received a letter from attorney Kevin <br /> Shenkman on behalf of Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, asserting the <br /> City's at-large councilmember election system violates the California Voting Rights Act <br /> ("CVRA") and threatening litigation if the City does not voluntarily change to a district- <br /> based election system for electing Councilmembers. <br /> WHEREAS, in a district-based election system, a candidate for City Council must <br /> live in the district which he or she wishes to represent, and only the voters of that district <br /> are entitled to vote to decide who their representative will be; <br /> WHEREAS, the City denies that its at-large councilmember electoral system <br /> violates the CVRA or any other provision of law and asserts the City's election system is <br /> legal in all respects and further denies any wrongdoing in connection with the manner in <br /> which it has conducted its City Council elections. Despite the foregoing, the City Council <br /> determined that the purposes of the CVRA and the public interest would be best served <br /> by transitioning to a district-based election system and avoiding the risks and costs of <br /> defending against a CVRA lawsuit; <br /> WHEREAS, under the provisions of California Elections Code Section 10010, a <br /> city that changes from an at-large city council method of election to a district-based city <br /> council method of election must hold a total of four public hearings, which includes at <br /> least two public hearings regarding potential voting district boundaries prior to the <br /> release and consideration of any draft voting district maps, and at least two public <br /> hearings following the release of draft voting district maps. <br /> WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on September 21, <br /> 2021, the City Council adopted a resolution that initiated the process of establishing a <br /> district-based election system and adopting the public hearing schedule; <br /> WHEREAS, upon the adoption of that resolution, Mr. Shenkman, on behalf of his <br /> clients, agreed to an extension of time by which the City could convert to districts, to <br /> and including March 17, 2022; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.