03 - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton Pleasanton Climate Action Plan 2.0 a. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? The Pleasanton General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element identifies 86 historic -aged properties and five historic neighborhoods potentially eligible for listing as historic resources.44 The CAP 2.0 would not involve land use or zoning changes but would promote infrastructure development and redevelopment that would be complimentary to existing development. CAP 2.0 projects would be required to comply with Pleasanton General Plan Conservation and Open Space goals, policies, and programs related to the preservation of historic resources, including Programs 5.1 and 5.2. These programs require the identification and protection of sites and structures within the City of architectural, historical, archaeological, and cultural significance and the inclusion of cultural resources studies, construction monitoring, and/or mitigation as appropriate for future development projects. This includes sites, structures, and areas that are associated with a historic event, activity, or persons that contribute to the historic character of districts, neighborhoods, landmarks, historic structures, and artifacts. CAP 2.0 projects and actions would be reviewed for compliance with applicable local, regional, and State regulations regarding cultural resources and the Pleasanton General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element to avoid adverse impacts related to historic resources. Therefore, the CAP 2.0 would result in a less -than -significant impact related to historical resources. b. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? The Pleasanton General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element acknowledges that scattered known archeological sites are primarily concentrated along arroyos and marsh areas and that there are likely to be additional areas of buried archaeological resources that have not been previously 44 Pleasanton, City of. 2009. Pleasanton General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element. Available: <httPs://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BloblD=23910>. Accessed October 7, 2021 40 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant No Impact Impact Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? ❑ ■ ^i b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? ❑ ❑ ■ �l c. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? _I F -I ■ f 1 a. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? The Pleasanton General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element identifies 86 historic -aged properties and five historic neighborhoods potentially eligible for listing as historic resources.44 The CAP 2.0 would not involve land use or zoning changes but would promote infrastructure development and redevelopment that would be complimentary to existing development. CAP 2.0 projects would be required to comply with Pleasanton General Plan Conservation and Open Space goals, policies, and programs related to the preservation of historic resources, including Programs 5.1 and 5.2. These programs require the identification and protection of sites and structures within the City of architectural, historical, archaeological, and cultural significance and the inclusion of cultural resources studies, construction monitoring, and/or mitigation as appropriate for future development projects. This includes sites, structures, and areas that are associated with a historic event, activity, or persons that contribute to the historic character of districts, neighborhoods, landmarks, historic structures, and artifacts. CAP 2.0 projects and actions would be reviewed for compliance with applicable local, regional, and State regulations regarding cultural resources and the Pleasanton General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element to avoid adverse impacts related to historic resources. Therefore, the CAP 2.0 would result in a less -than -significant impact related to historical resources. b. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? The Pleasanton General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element acknowledges that scattered known archeological sites are primarily concentrated along arroyos and marsh areas and that there are likely to be additional areas of buried archaeological resources that have not been previously 44 Pleasanton, City of. 2009. Pleasanton General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element. Available: <httPs://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BloblD=23910>. Accessed October 7, 2021 40