Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS <br />The PMC Section 18.68.110 sets forth the purposes of the PUD District and considerations to <br />be addressed in reviewing a PUD development plan. These purposes and considerations are <br />set forth in the draft Resolution included as Exhibit A, and includes whether the plan is in <br />conformance with the City's General Plan, in the best interest of public health, safety, and <br />general welfare, and whether the plan would be compatible with developed properties in the <br />vicinity. As described in Exhibit A, and based on the information and analysis provided in this <br />agenda report, staff recommends the Commission make the required findings to recommend <br />approval of the project. <br />PUBLIC NOTICE <br />Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a <br />1,000 -foot radius of the site. At the time this report was published, staff had not received any <br />public comments. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br />Environmental review for the proposed project was undertaken with the Initial Study/Negative <br />Declaration adopted by the City Council for RZ-97-2 in conformance with the standards of the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). There are not substantial changes to the project <br />or the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken that involve new significant <br />environmental effects or that substantially increase the severity of previously identified effects. <br />Furthermore, there is no new information of substantial importance which was unknown at the <br />time the Initial Study/Negative Declaration was adopted by the City Council regarding the <br />project or its effects, mitigation measures, or alternatives. Any previously identified effects or <br />impacts are mitigated to a level of insignificance, with the mitigation measures incorporated <br />into the project's design or imposed on the project pursuant to the conditions of approval. <br />Therefore, no new environmental document accompanies this agenda report. <br />SUMMARY/CONCLUSION <br />Staff has reviewed the subject proposal and believes the proposed density, development <br />standards, architecture, site design, lot configuration, and landscaping are consistent with the <br />General Plan and Zoning programs, policies, and goals including all regulations and design <br />guidelines. Staff also believes the architectural style and design of the new home and <br />accessory buildings are appropriate for the area. Therefore, the project, as conditioned, merits <br />a favorable recommendation by the Planning Commission. <br />Primary Author: Natalie Amos, Associate Planner, namos cit of leasantonca. ov <br />Reviewed/Approved By: <br />Melinda Denis, Planning and Permit Center Manager <br />Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development <br />PUD -144, 3 74 7 Trenery Drive <br />9 of 9 <br />Planning Commission <br />